Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
65/100Some classes are called easy, but , and .
; there are no online reviews.
CNET · CNET75B · CNET50 · CNET50F · CNET60A · CNET5159 · CNET60C · CNETALL · CNET75C · 11 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Some classes are called easy, but students still need self-motivation, reading, and lab work to do well.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews; there are no online reviews.
Is the course easy?
The material is manageable for students with IT interest, but certification topics and labs require real engagement.
All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person networking and Windows courses.
Is attendance flexible?
Reviews do not clearly prove whether attendance is optional or mandatory.
In-person reviews discuss lectures and labs but do not clearly state an attendance rule.
Is this professor recommended?
Most students recommend him for knowledge, helpfulness, and labs, despite complaints about boring lectures.
Recommendation evidence is entirely from in-person reviews.
Course guide
Grading
Lenient
70/100
One review directly says he is easy, and low difficulty ratings suggest grading is not harsh.
Format shift
All grading evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Workload
Moderate
55/100
Labs and reading matter, but reviews do not describe an overwhelming workload.
Format shift
In-person reviews mention labs and self-study, with no online workload evidence.
Teaching experience
Good
78/100
He is widely described as helpful and knowledgeable, but repeated comments criticize dull lectures and some disorganization.
Format shift
Teaching evidence is entirely from in-person reviews.
Assessment method
Balanced
55/100
Reviews mention labs, assignments, and tests, with no clear sign that exams dominate the grade.
Format shift
In-person comments support a mix of lab work and tests.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
In-person reviews describe a knowledgeable and helpful instructor with strong labs but uneven lecture quality.
Main concern
Lectures may feel boring, disorganized, or too dependent on the book.
What students said
“It is clear he was always interested in helping students learn.”
“You have to be self motivated and read the text beforehand as he won't (and shouldn't IMO) go through every little detail in the text”
“Dreadfully boring lectures, trouble staying awake.”
Remote format
Low confidence
No stored summary is available for this format.
Main concern
No main concern is stored for this format.
Exam style
Reviews mention tests based on book or certification material, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or open-book rules.
Assessment risk
Standard
50/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book, closed-book, or proctored.
“Lecture is word for word from the book, as is the test.”
“His exams not related to actual MCSE exam material, more of obscure book oriented questions.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Course material and lectures were great, relevant, and covered the MCSE exam topics.”
“The best at Foothill's computer lab.I will take class from him again. Very helpful and Very clear.”
“Yes he is easy, but that is about the only good thing.”
“He does a lot of great work for labs.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
11
Recent reviews read by the AI
11
Lifetime ratings
86/100
Evidence confidence
Eleven detailed in-person reviews across several years show consistent themes about labs, knowledge, and lecture quality.
Inside 11 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
0 reported outcomes
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values