AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Tonya Hough

CAST92B · CAST90A · CAST92A · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh graderUnclear instructionsRude communicationPoor teachingDisorganized materials
  • Students overwhelmingly describe poor teaching and weak course organization.
  • , and unclear.
  • Students repeatedly advise avoiding the instructor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Getting an A appears difficult because as harsh, unpredictable, and .

All authoritative format counts classify the reviews as in person; no online reviews are counted.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The concepts are not described as impossible, but poor instruction and should be.

All course challenge evidence comes from reviews counted as in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews , though they describe rigid rules and inflexibility.

In-person-counted reviews mention rules but not a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

because of poor teaching, rude communication, and .

Recommendation evidence is entirely from reviews counted as in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Multiple students report nitpicky, unpredictable, and .

Format shift

as in person.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is made heavier by unclear instructions, hidden rubrics, and .

Format shift

In-person-counted reviews describe grading .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviews consistently say she does not teach, relies on links or books, and communicates poorly.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely from reviews counted as in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews focus on assignments, rubrics, images, tutorials, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person-labeled reviews are strongly negative, with repeated , and communication.

Main concern

Students report , and little direct teaching.

What students said

“ .”
CAST90A
“Really nitpicky, very harsh grader - takes marks off for things that have nothing to do with the image e.g. how you name layers.”
CAST92A
“She does not tell and takes off a lot of .”
CAST92A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring requirements.

Exam Policy Unclear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

8/100

“Avoid.”

⚖️

10/100

“ and often literally contradicted her instructions.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She doesn't teach, she steals course content from other websites.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't teach, she steals course content from other websites.
  • She does not teach but provides "links" to tutorials.
  • everything came straight from the book.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Really nitpicky, very harsh grader - takes marks off for things that have nothing to do with the image e.g. how you name layers.
  • She does not tell and takes off a lot of .
  • and often literally contradicted her instructions.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • She is easily irritated, and sends angry messages to students.
  • Inflexible and rude.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Ten detailed reviews are highly consistent in their negative assessment of , and communication.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

CAST90A4 reviews
CAST92A4 reviews
CAST92B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values