AI Rate Professor

Biology

Gerda Endemann

NUTRIENTCLASS · BIO41 · NUTR45 · BIOL45 · NUT45 · BIO45 · BIOL045 · HEALTH21 · HLTH21 · HEALTH · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you can study lecture notes carefully and tolerate tricky exams, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeableTricky ExamsLecture Notes MatterMixed Teaching ReviewsGPA Risk
  • Students agree she is knowledgeable, but teaching quality is sharply divided.
  • Grades depend heavily on memorizing her notes and handling tricky tests.
  • The course content is often described as manageable, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible through disciplined note study, but and limited make it far from effortless.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

Many students say the material itself is simple or clear, but memorization volume and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Reviews emphasize studying lecture notes and class materials, but they do .

policy evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

and nutrition knowledge, but many warn against her exams and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Several students describe tricky tests, no , and grade penalties that make scoring well difficult.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload centers on notes, slides, and lot of material.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is often called knowledgeable and , but many students find lectures dull or poorly delivered.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments repeatedly focus on , and class averages.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with praise for knowledge and clarity but and GPA risk.

Main concern

The main concern is that and unforgiving even when the material seems simple.

What students said

“There is a lot of material, but if you're willing to work, you'll do fine.”
BIO45
“So many tricky questions, no extra credits at all”
BIOL45

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because students repeatedly report tricky tests based on her notes with little grade cushion.

Tricky TestsFill-In-The-Blank TestsLecture Notes BasedNo Extra Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe tricky tests, fill-in-the-blank formats, and .

Tricky TestsFill-In-The-Blank TestsLecture Notes BasedNo Extra Credit
“ and so poorly written”
NUTR45
“all the ”
BIOL45
“So many tricky questions, no extra credits at all”
BIOL45

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is a lot of material, but if you're willing to work, you'll do fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“There is no denying her knowledge, but teaching is not her forte”

📈 Grade Effort

52/100

“If you can do this faithfully, you will get A.”

🧪

32/100

“So many tricky questions, no extra credits at all”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgeable and approachable.
  • .
  • Teaching isn't her forte.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a lot of material, but if you're willing to work, you'll do fine.
  • if you want to get an A, look for someone else.
  • I ended up with an A-.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • Multiple choice tests are really easy if .
  • and so poorly written

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews across multiple years provide rich, , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 54
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BIO459 reviews
BIOL456 reviews
NUTR452 reviews
BIO411 review
BIOL0451 review
Show 5 more courses
HEALTH1 review
HEALTH211 review
HLTH211 review
NUT451 review
NUTRIENTCLASS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values