AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · Mathematics

Susan Swagert

MATH220 · MATH200101 · MATH010 · MATH105 · MATH101 · MATH51 · STATMATH10 · MATH224 · MATH10 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can learn independently and , and notes to protect your grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful one-on-oneDisorganized lecturesLenient gradingHeavy homeworkMixed clarity
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found her patient and helpful and students who felt lost in lecture.
  • Grades can be manageable because of , and relatively fair tests, but the workload can be heavy.
  • because many comments mention confusion and mistakes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A , and effort, but weak lecture clarity can make the path uneven.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The math content is not always inherently hard, but and mistakes can make it feel much harder.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but several students describe class time as low value or .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

She is recommended by students who value patience and , but strongly avoided .

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Students repeatedly mention fair , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and some reviews describe very large or poorly timed assignments.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Her one-on-one help is praised, but lecture clarity, organization, responsiveness, and accuracy are inconsistent.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention , and finals, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for patience and grade support but repeated complaints about and disorganization.

Main concern

Lecture clarity is inconsistent, so students may need .

What students said

“She explained things very well and and after class.”
MATH105
“She does most of the math in her head and so prepare to be utterly lost.”
MATH220
“Wanna .)? Take her class!”
MATH51

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam comments are mixed, but notes, curves, and than strict.

Notes AllowedFair TestsCurved ExamsHard Tests Vary By Course

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly , and limited test time.

Notes AllowedFair TestsCurved ExamsHard TestsLimited Time
“Let's you use notes during the final.”
MATH51
“her quizzes and .”
MATH105
“ and their not multiple choice.”
MATH10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Wanna .)? Take her class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

55/100

“She explained things very well and and after class.”

75/100

“ !”

Lecture Risk

45/100

“She does most of the math in her head and so prepare to be utterly lost.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • She explained things very well and and after class.
  • She makes a lot of mistakes and confuses herself.
  • Nice lady; always willing to help.

Theme 2

Grades And Workload

  • Wanna .)? Take her class!
  • She does give a LOT of homework, but if and do it, you will see the results!!
  • She grades on a curve.

Theme 3

  • Let's you use notes during the final.
  • her quizzes and .
  • and their not multiple choice.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 28 detailed in-person reviews span many years and show consistent recurring themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 58
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH108 reviews
MATH517 reviews
MATH1013 reviews
MATH2203 reviews
MATH1052 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH2242 reviews
MATH0101 review
MATH2001011 review
STATMATH101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values