AI Rate Professor

Computer Applications

Farber John

CAST107D · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
3/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can handle poor structure and minimal support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedShort Notice AssignmentsUnhelpful CommunicationSyllabus Issues
  • The only review is strongly negative about organization and communication.
  • Assignments were described as spontaneous and given with little notice.
  • There is .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

There is no grade evidence, and only moderate stated difficulty.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The review does not say the material is hard, but the poor structure makes the course harder to manage.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The student calls him the and criticizes both organization and communication.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

The review mentions grading work but .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

15/100

the workload feel stressful and poorly planned.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The review describes poor syllabus follow-through, sudden assignments, and sarcastic email responses.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The only concrete assessment evidence is spontaneous assignments, with .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The by syllabus issues, sudden assignments, and sarcastic communication.

Main concern

The main concern is unreliable course organization and unhelpful communication.

What students said

“Doesn't follow posted syllabus.”
CAST107D
“ .”
CAST107D

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or .

Exam Policy Not Clear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Doesn't follow posted syllabus.”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Doesn't follow posted syllabus.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • .
  • Answers e-mails sardonically

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so confidence is low even though the opinion is detailed and strongly negative.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CAST107D1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values