AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Paula Schales

COIN74A · COIN074A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Paula Schales if you want a structured course where effort, revisions, and communication are strongly rewarded.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful InstructorFast GraderResubmission FriendlyWell StructuredHighly Recommended
  • Students consistently describe clear structure, strong subject knowledge, and helpful support.
  • because students can revise assignments and effort is rewarded.
  • All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews analyzed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A looks very achievable because resubmissions are allowed and .

The evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online reviews analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course seems manageable because lessons are clearly laid out, though the content still requires real participation.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but participation and forums appear important.

Only in-person reviews mention participation, and there is .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and fair with grading.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

because students can resubmit work and effort is explicitly rewarded.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Assignments are engaging and structured, but reviews do not suggest the workload is effortless.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently praise her clear , and helpful support.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews , and forum participation, not exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly , and helpful instruction.

Main concern

The small and old review set limits certainty despite consistent praise.

What students said

“She gives you 3 tries to submit assignments - if you turn it in and there are errors you can redo.”
COIN74A
“ rewarded.”
COIN74A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or requirements.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ rewarded.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“The instructor demonstrates subject knowledge and passion.”

⚖️

92/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • clearly .
  • The instructor demonstrates subject knowledge and passion.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Feedback

  • She is the fastest grader - she always graded within 2 days and usually within hours the same day.
  • rewarded.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

and they are old, but they are detailed and highly consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COIN74A2 reviews
COIN074A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values