AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Newton Chan

CTIS0030 · HTMLII · CIS15P · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you already know the material and can learn independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProChaotic TeachingKnowledgeable But UnhelpfulUnclear DirectionsChallenging HomeworkAvoid If You Need Support
  • Students consistently describe his teaching as disorganized and .
  • He appears knowledgeable, but students say he gives little useful help.
  • The programming background.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

There is , and the comments emphasize challenging work and limited support.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The programming work sounds hard, especially for students without a strong object-oriented background.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

One student says he has a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Students warn against taking him because the , and unsupported.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Reviews , but the difficult work and lack of help make high grades risky.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

as challenging, though the review set does not prove an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students say he knows the subject but cannot teach clearly or answer questions helpfully.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The only clear .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a knowledgeable instructor whose explanations, directions, and .

Main concern

Students who need structure or help may struggle badly.

What students said

“Instructor approach a bit chaotic - he cannot teach.”
CTIS0030
“He refused to help me, even when I asked and told him I couldn't understand his .”
HTMLII

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Instructor approach a bit chaotic - he cannot teach.”

⚠️ Student Support

15/100

“Don't count on asking him questions.”

📚 Workload Challenge

35/100

“His homeworks were challenging.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Instructor approach a bit chaotic - he cannot teach.
  • If you want an .

Theme 2

🧩 About Support

  • Don't count on asking him questions.
  • He refused to help me, even when I asked and told him I couldn't understand his .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty

  • His homeworks were challenging.
  • If you are already have a strong background OO programming practice you can pick out the useful pieces from his scatter shot approach.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but their negative teaching concerns are consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIS15P1 review
CTIS00301 review
HTMLII1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values