AI Rate Professor

Physical Ed

Arno Dominguez

WEIGHTS · PESW · HP · BADMINTON · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you want a supportive, low-pressure physical education class with a friendly coach.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFriendly coachMotivatingOrganizedHighly recommendedComfortable class
  • Students consistently describe him as friendly, motivating, and easy to learn from.
  • The class appears low-stress and physically engaging rather than academically difficult.
  • All , so confidence is limited by age.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Reviews suggest very low difficulty, but there is .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Students describe the class as accessible, comfortable, and based on coaching rather than hard academic content.

All course easiness evidence comes from in-person physical education reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students repeatedly recommend him because , and motivating.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

The difficulty ratings are very low, but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention the class experience, with .

Workload

Light

86/100

Reviews frame the class as a workout and coaching experience with no signs of .

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person physical education classes.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students consistently describe him as , and motivating.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person, with no online comparison.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

Reviews do not mention exams and suggest performance-based physical education assessment instead.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not describe formal exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and motivating coach who makes class comfortable.

Main concern

The only concern is that the evidence is old and limited to five reviews.

What students said

“ and sportsmanship at any level of play”
BADMINTON
“makes you feel comfortable in class”
HP
“Full of good humor and motivation.”
WEIGHTS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , and the course .

No Clear Exam EvidenceActivity-Based Course

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove any webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, final, or .

No Clear Exam EvidenceActivity-Based Course
“A great work-out, good teacher and coach.”
BADMINTON

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A great work-out, good teacher and coach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and class atmosphere. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“ and sportsmanship at any level of play”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“Highly reccomended :)”

❤️ Classroom Tone

94/100

“Funny guy, more like a friend than a teacher makes you feel comfortable in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • really helpfull and has a great attiude
  • and sportsmanship at any level of play
  • good teacher and coach

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • personable, friendly, professional
  • Full of good humor and motivation.
  • Friendly guy. Highly recomended

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistent but and policy detail.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

WEIGHTS2 reviews
BADMINTON1 review
HP1 review
PESW1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values