AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Katherine Zdanky

ACCT1A · ACTG1B · ACCT1B · ACTGACTG · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

Take her if you want a and a low workload.

Best fit · Easy A HunterClear teacherExtra credit heavyLow homeworkPractical knowledgeGood for grades
  • Students describe her as , and generally helpful.
  • and limited homework make the course unusually grade-friendly.
  • Evidence is short and mostly positive, but one review is a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

and very limited homework make a high grade look very attainable with modest effort.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Accounting still requires learning concepts, but students say and reduces unnecessary workload.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One student asks whether , but no review clearly answers the policy.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Students recommend her for , and low homework burden.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

94/100

Multiple comments point to major and as strong grade support.

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

91/100

Students report only a small portion of and no signs of heavy workload.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students describe her as , and helpful, though several comments are brief.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person, with no online comparison.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews focus on homework and , while .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person students describe clear teaching, professional knowledge, major , and .

Main concern

, and one review does not provide actual course experience.

What students said

“We could earn 10% of our grade by .”
ACCT1B
“This teacher gives like a million points and only makes you do like 5% of the .”
ACCT1A
“She teach clearly and give good concept”
ACTGACTG

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the policy.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book, closed-book, midterm, final, or exam difficulty policies.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher gives like a million points and only makes you do like 5% of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“she is really good teacher. She teach clearly and give good concept”

📈 Easy A Potential

92/100

“We could earn 10% of our grade by .”

⚖️

94/100

“This teacher gives like a million points and only makes you do like 5% of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She brought alot of professional accounting knowledge to the class but is funny too.
  • I think she is good
  • She teach clearly and give good concept

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • We could earn 10% of our grade by .
  • This teacher gives like a million points and only makes you do like 5% of the .
  • But yet you still learn what you need to learn.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

56/100

Evidence confidence

Five in-person reviews are mostly consistent, but comments are short, old, and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACTG1B2 reviews
ACCT1A1 review
ACCT1B1 review
ACTGACTG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values