AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Jonathan Miller

REL002 · REL02 · PHIL1 · PHIL025 · PHIL030 · PHIL25 · PHIL001 · PH025 · PHIL003 · REL001 · PHIL25H · RELG002 · RELG2 · RELG02 · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
81.82%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will attend and participate; if you need a no-show easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardParticipation requiredExtra credit heavyDaily quizzesClear structureKnowledgeable lectures
  • daily quizzes and .
  • Tons of and with effort.
  • Content is manageable if you memorize terms and keep up with readings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Large EC buffers and if you attend, participate, and memorize terms.

; online sample is too thin to change the pattern.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Concepts are approachable, but volume of vocab and if you fall behind.

In-person notes rushed lectures and many terms; one online negative review calls religion content weak.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and ; missing class repeatedly tanks points.

In-person is clearly mandatory; the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and fair paths to A despite attendance pressure.

In-person strongly positive; online is split one yes one no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

and EC can be around 10 percent of the course.

Format shift

A minority call him a and lateness; .

Workload

Light

62/100

; main work is readings plus in-class quizzes and short writings.

Format shift

; online negative review alleged lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly , and often funny or inspiring.

Format shift

Nearly all praise is in-person; online has one excellent and .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Daily quizzes, participation, short writings, and .

Format shift

Some sections open-book midterms and finals; others quiz-heavy matching and writing every other class.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and engaging knowledge if they attend every class.

Main concern

, and participation points punish absences.

What students said

“Participate in class for , and you'll get an A.”
REL001
“Midterm and :), most of the work is done in class time.”
PH025
“not showing up to class on a regular basis will destroy you.”
RELG002

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One glowing online PHIL review and one very negative online RELG review leave a mixed online picture.

Main concern

Sparse online sample includes a and professional quality low.

What students said

“Professor Miller goes the extra mile in providing his students with .”
PHIL025
“ .”
RELG002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly frequent short quizzes and writings, with some open-book major exams and heavy EC.

Frequent vocab quizzesIn-class writingOpen book midterm/final in some sectionsStudy guidesParticipation graded

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and sometimes open-book midterms and finals.

Matching vocab quizzesIn-class writingOpen book/open note examsStudy guides
“Midterm and :)”
PH025
“quiz matching vocabulary .”
REL001

Online

Too few ; one positive PHIL and one negative RELG only.

Limited online evidence
“organizing his material in a very coherent way.”
PHIL025

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! and extremely intelligent.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, centering attendance, EC, and lecture quality. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ , and he sets the standard for what all professors should be.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“If you want a !!!”

📌

18/100

“not showing up to class on a regular basis will destroy you.”

🎁 Path

76/100

“Generous amount of with around 10% of the total grade account for extra credit.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's a legit genius and I hope to one day be as knowledgable as him.
  • Memes to help me learn with ease? Heck yes!
  • Super enthusiastic about the material which makes you enthusiastic.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's a lot of memorization but it's easy.
  • Lots of so don't worry about your in .
  • Not an easy A if you don't put in a solid effort.

Theme 3

📅

  • You really can't miss even one class though or else you might fall a bit behind.
  • PARTICIPATE
  • if you don't then it's 10% of your grade that you missed out on.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with , and structure; only two online reviews.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 541
4 out of 511
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

REL0019 reviews
PHIL0018 reviews
PHIL0257 reviews
RELG0027 reviews
PHIL0034 reviews
Show 9 more courses
REL0024 reviews
PHIL25H3 reviews
PHIL252 reviews
PH0251 review
PHIL0301 review
PHIL11 review
REL021 review
RELG021 review
RELG21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

32

A+ 17 · A 15

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3