AI Rate Professor

Communication

Barbara Naylor

TVR17A · TVR18 · TVR16B · TVR019 · TELCM17A · TVR15 · TVR16A · TVR001 · TVR26B · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
3.85%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you have no alternative and can self-teach while .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderGroup Project DumpCanvas ChaosUnclear InstructionsAvoid At All Costs
  • Students , and condescending with almost no take-again support.
  • Heavy group work often replaces teaching while and .
  • Online modules and Canvas use are especially broken; , and participation traps.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students still land A or B, but tough grading, few high-stakes items, and grind or a coin flip.

Both online and in-person stress tough grading; online and late mass grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Content is not always advanced, but , and student-led lectures make the course feel harder than the material alone.

Online difficulty centers on Canvas chaos and group work; and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and stress participation points or penalties for missing class.

; online mixed, with but still heavy synchronous group demands.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Near-zero would-take-again rate and a flood of almost all students.

and in person across recent years.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and project marks, and grades swinging late.

Format shift

Harsh tone is consistent; online emphasizes group-project grades, in-person emphasizes participation and finals.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and reading make the load heavy relative to learning payoff.

Format shift

Online group projects and modules pile up; , and tight finals.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Students say she barely teaches, rambles off-topic, misuses Canvas, and outsources lectures to group presentations.

Format shift

Online failures focus on Canvas and modules; and student-taught sessions.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and occasional heavy finals rather than pure exams.

Format shift

Online leans group projects and unit quizzes; , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews dominate and paint a bleak picture: little real teaching, student-run , and mandatory participation.

Main concern

, and students forced to teach each other.

What students said

“Absolute waste of time and money. Teaches nothing, textbook doesn't teach to the quiz, and .”
TVR001
“Bleak. The way she organizes her class is incoherent; she is either incompetent or does it on purpose so you fail.”
TVR26B
“ .”
TVR15

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

late or unpublished modules, , and heavy group projects that do not match content.

Main concern

Canvas organization and .

What students said

“I have no clue why she teaches an online, if .”
TVR001
“The so far. Refuses to teach. Spends more time being condescending and rude than actually doing their job.”
TVR019
“She grades horribly and is quite passive aggressive. She takes a while ONLINE CLASS.”
TVR001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and material, with high-stakes finals and little student-friendly exam design.

Test HeavyAmbiguous Quiz QuestionsPop QuizzesHigh-Stakes Final Projects

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes are described as ambiguous, nuanced, and designed to trick students, with .

Ambiguous Exam QuestionsTest HeavyHigh-Stakes Final Project
“ but to trick you into getting the wrong answers.”
TVR17A
“I ended the class going from a B to a D after failing the knowledge on how to do it.”
TVR15

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes that do not match modules and pop-quiz style risk, but .

Quizzes Mismatch MaterialBeware of Pop Quizzes
“ .”
TVR001
“Beware of pop quizzes”
TVR15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She openly expresses she doesn't .”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews (5 online, 32 in person), highlighting consistent , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

8/100

“ !”

📉 Teaching Quality

16/100

“She couldn't teach a baby that water is wet & the sky is blue.”

⚖️

18/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Without Payoff

32/100

“By week 10, she's only lectured 3 or 4 times while assigning 3 group projects where WE teach the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teaches nothing, textbook doesn't teach to the quiz
  • She basically just reiterates what was in the textbook
  • Her teaching style is for students to talk out the assignments.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • YOU WILL GET A C
  • She graded months of of class

Theme 3

💻

  • modules would never publish on time
  • She openly expresses she doesn't .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

37 detailed reviews spanning many years with , and teaching make credibility high.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 510
1 out of 519

Course coverage

TVR16A9 reviews
TVR158 reviews
TVR17A8 reviews
TVR0015 reviews
TELCM17A2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
TVR26B2 reviews
TVR0191 review
TVR16B1 review
TVR181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

6

C 3 · C- 3

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1