AI Rate Professor

English

Amy Tahani-Bidmeshki

ENGL075 · ENG001A · ENG52 · ENGLISH001 · ENG1C · ENG001AH · ENGL001B · ENGL030C · 76 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
84.21%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Great pick for an if you engage with social-justice topics; skip if you want apolitical traditional English.

Best fit · Easy A HunterSocial-justice focusedEssay-based easy AStrong feedbackDiscussion heavyPolarizing politics
  • Most students report , and an
  • Course content centers on race, power, and current events rather than traditional literary survey
  • A vocal minority finds the political framing biased or uncomfortable, so fit

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Students repeatedly say show-up effort, a few essays, and As.

Both online and ; grade reports are overwhelmingly A or A+.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Reading and discussion matter, but prompts and courses.

; in-person adds more live debate but still light writing counts.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

and value participation, though some online async options are more flexible.

In-person more often mandatory; several online honors and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

and grades, tempered by consistent political-content complaints.

Online recommendations are broadly positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Few , and supportive feedback make grades soft.

Format shift

Generosity is reported in both formats; some students say .

Workload

Light

80/100

Typical load is 2-4 essays, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online often 3-4 essays; total.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Many call her caring, passionate, and transformative, while critics say lectures are repetitive or overly political.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong overall; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment is essay- and discussion-driven with little evidence of traditional high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize essays and posts; quizzes appear occasionally online as low-stakes checks.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person , and light grading, with a minority objecting to political emphasis.

Main concern

Classroom politics and open debate can feel alienating if you disagree with the framing.

What students said

“ ”
ENG001A
“This class opens your eyes to a lot of relevant topics and really gets the metaphorical gears turning in your brain.”
ENGL001B
“This professor multiple times continues to ask students about their political beliefs instead of English.”
ENG001A

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online and async sections are praised for , and manageable discussion-quiz loads.

Main concern

You must manage 3-4 essays without procrastinating; topics are current-events heavy.

What students said

“Fun class, 3 . !”
ENG001A
“I highly reccomend this class if you while also getting an A.”
ENG001AH
“Only had 2 essays and a .”
ENG001A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Courses are built around a handful of essays and discussions, not strict proctored finals.

Essay-basedDiscussion postsFew or no examsOccasional short quizzesCompletion-friendly grading

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation with little mention of formal exams or proctoring.

Few essaysParticipation discussionsNo pop exams generally
“We wrote 3 essays and . but also no .”
ENG001A
“Two essays and !”
ENG001A

Online

Online evidence supports 2-4 essays, discussion boards, and a few easy quizzes; .

2-4 essaysDiscussion boardsShort quizzesAsync-friendly
“4 Essays in total, 1 of them is the final... There is a and a .”
ENG001AH
“We had 2 essays, multiple discussions boards, and a few quizzes.”
ENG001A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're looking for an easy A she is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, balancing easy-A praise with political-content controversy. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Impact

82/100

“Dr. Tahani genuinely changed the trajectory of my education and molded me into the student that I am today.”

🅰️ Easy Grade Path

88/100

“ ”

⚖️ Content Polarization

40/100

“This professor multiple times continues to ask students about their political beliefs instead of English.”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's chill and
  • open discussions so if you have an opinion make sure to speak up
  • great lectures, super nuanced class discussions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A
  • Only had 2 essays and a

Theme 3

⚖️ About Course Politics

  • she wants us to learn this stuff bc these stuff is still happening rn
  • Talks about political views and if you do not agree welp
  • We learn about whiteness and how European Enlightenment created races

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

76

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with rich detail and recurring themes across online and , if polarized, evidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 557
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENG001A25 reviews
ENG001AH14 reviews
ENGL001B3 reviews
ENGL0753 reviews
ENG1C2 reviews
Show 3 more courses
ENG521 review
ENGL030C1 review
ENGLISH0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

50 reported outcomes

A range

48

A+ 16 · A 31 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1