AI Rate Professor

English

Akilah Brown

ENG1A · ENGL01A · ENGL1A · ENG001A · ENGL37773 · ENGL1C · ENGL001A · ENGL005A · ENGLISH400 · ENG001B · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
28.13%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you are already a strong, organized writer who can absorb a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderPaper heavyNo late workHeavy workloadPassive-aggressive tone
  • Most recent reviews warn of extreme paper volume, zero flexibility on lateness, and .
  • An A is possible only with meticulous rule-following and long hours; and .
  • Older reviews are warmer, but the unless you want a bootcamp writing load.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students earn As, but only through meticulous formatting, heavy writing, and .

Both online and ; online adds unclear rubrics.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and multi-hour weekly papers make the course intellectually and logistically demanding.

Difficulty is high across formats; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as required, and missing class or deadlines is punished hard.

; online is flexible on presence but rigid on deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Only about one in , and recent comments repeatedly say choose anyone else.

A few older online and in-person fans exist, but recent consensus is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; late work is often zeroed and rubrics are called picky or unclear.

Format shift

difference.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students report 7-10 assignments a week, long annotated bibliographies, and many all-nighters.

Format shift

Workload intensity is extreme online and in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Personality can be funny or caring for some, but many describe dismissiveness, confusion, and .

Format shift

Older in-person reviews are warmer; recent reviews across formats are much colder.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and strict submission rules rather than classic exams.

Format shift

Paper and and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person classes often start full and , and passive-aggressive classroom dynamics.

Main concern

, and weak communication or absences without notice.

What students said

“All you need to know is in the beginning, this class had 20 people in class and in the end there was only 3-5 in the class.”
ENG001A
“If your assignment is 1 minute late, she does not accept it.”
ENG001A
“Absolutely horrible. and quite rude.”
ENG001B

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online English sections still pile on reading, annotations, and and little sympathy for personal crises.

Main concern

, and zero late-work flexibility can tank grades quickly.

What students said

“Gives busy work rather than teaches. .”
ENGL005A
“Still remembering the time I was in her class and due to family issues could not get a and did not care at all.”
ENG001A
“rubic is so unclear and ”
ENG001B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is writing-centered with strict deadlines more than classic proctored exams.

So many papersAnnotated bibliographyStrict deadline policyUnclear rubricsExtra credit limited

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

lateness and high weekly writing load.

So many papers1-minute-late equals zeroAnnotated bibliography
“If your assignment is 1 minute late, she does not accept it.”
ENG001A
“Be prepared for a 20ish page useless annotated bibliography mid semester!”
ENG001A

Online

, and annotations with and no late work.

So many papersNo late assignmentsUnclear rubrics
“rubic is so unclear and ”
ENG001B
“ .”
ENGL005A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save yourself. Please. All you need to know is in the beginning, this class had 20 people in class and in the end there was only 3-5 in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews (9 online, 23 in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Low Recommendation

28/100

“just stay away !!!”

📝

18/100

“She gives out 7-10 assignments a week and each take 1-2 hours or more.”

⚖️

22/100

“A .”

🧱 Zero Flexibility

20/100

“If your assignment is even 1 second late it is a 0”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • So rude. So innocuous. So dismissive.
  • treats students like elementary schoolers
  • She's super funny as well
  • Gives busy work rather than teaches

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • to get an A would be easy if you followed the rules meticulously
  • changed the
  • She is the

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • At least 8 hours of hw per week
  • lots of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

32 reviews over many years show a harsh recent reports, with strong theme consistency.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 516

Course coverage

ENG001A11 reviews
ENG001B7 reviews
ENGL001A3 reviews
ENGL005A3 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ENGL1A2 reviews
ENGL01A1 review
ENGL1C1 review
ENGL377731 review
ENGLISH4001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 8

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

4

C 2 · C- 2

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1