AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Meredith Goldsmith

HUM001 · HUM002 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
48.15%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if and projects for a fair shot at an A, especially async with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardReading heavyCaringExtra creditFilm-focused lecturesLenient grading
  • Most students can earn high grades if they keep up with , and projects.
  • Workload is reading- and .
  • ; online async is more flexible but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many A and A+ , and lenient late-work policies make high marks achievable with consistent effort.

Online reviews more often say easy A; pressure.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is introductory humanities, but and .

; difficulty mainly comes from volume of reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

Online async often treats attendance as optional, while .

Online evidence leans optional; in-person evidence leans mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; fans love caring teaching while and film focus.

Online recommendation is mixed by workload; and content disappointment.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Students frequently note , late-work acceptance, and .

Format shift

Leniency is clearest online; .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Steady readings, discussions, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online and ; some in-person also add museum-style extras.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

, and engaging, while others want less film focus and more traditional humanities breadth.

Format shift

; online quality depends on how complete modules feel.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and group projects more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Online emphasizes discussions and papers; in-person adds participation and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students often praise caring teaching and but split on film-heavy class time and .

Main concern

and substantial homework or reading expectations.

What students said

“ .”
HUM002
“Overall, this is an easy class if you do all the work on time.”
HUM001
“too much time was devoted to discussing films rather than exploring the broader humanities concepts”
HUM001

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online async sections are often called doable or easy A with , and lots of reading; quality varies by semester structure.

Main concern

and occasional sparse lecture videos or group-project friction.

What students said

“Easy A class! Took the online half semester course.”
HUM001
“ ++. Everything is open note and no time limit.”
HUM002
“The most stressful class, throughout the whole semester, she never posted a single video of lectures”
HUM002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are generally student-friendly with open-note or low-pressure quizzes and writing projects.

Open note quizzesExtra creditUntimed quizzesPapers and projectsMidterm papers

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention chapter quizzes, midterm papers, group finals, and .

Chapter quizzesMidterm paperGroup finalExtra credit
“Mainly lectures, .”
HUM001
“ on most online quizzes and .”
HUM001

Online

Online students report open-note untimed quizzes, discussions, papers, and .

Open noteNo time limitWeekly quizzesGroup project
“Everything is open note and no time limit.”
HUM002
“There was plenty of on the .”
HUM001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A class! Took the online half semester course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“Professor Goldsmith is a great teacher. She wants you to learn and !”

📖 Reading Load

42/100

“Be prepared to spent hours of your time reading course materials and doing projects”

🅰️ Easy Grades

78/100

“prof is so easy you could probably show up once a month and get an a.”

❤️ Caring Presence

74/100

“She is such a sweet and caring professor!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She literally got me started on how to watch movies very critically
  • too much time was devoted to discussing films
  • She is very passionate about teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • offers a lot of on the
  • Should easily get an A!
  • accepts late work for full credit

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • assigns tons of , and projects
  • and expected a lot out of you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven recent reviews give solid coverage across online and in-person, with mixed but and grade accessibility.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HUM00120 reviews
HUM0027 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 7 · A 12 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1