AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Jason Huh

CIS12 · CIS112 · CIS112ONLINE · CIS10 · CS112 · CIS165167 · CIS012 · CIS35068 · 94 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless you already know Python well and while meeting his exact, unforgiving style rules.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRuthless GraderCrushing WorkloadLecture MistakesSlow FeedbackAvoid Online
  • Most students call him a tough, zero-partial-credit grader who docks points for tiny code style issues.
  • Workload is extreme in short terms, with reports of 25+ assignments per week and little useful lecture support.
  • Many warn that positive reviews look fake and that emails and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Even capable students report zeros for tiny mistakes, delayed grades with no resubmit chance, and little partial credit, so an A requires near-perfect match to his exact rules.

; online reviews are louder about zeros and unreachable help.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content is intro Python, but , and concepts not covered in class make the class feel much harder than it should.

Online comments stress mismatch between lectures and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while others do not; value of sitting through lectures is widely questioned.

Evidence is mixed in both formats; many online students say lectures add little.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Roughly one-third would take again, and the and learn Python elsewhere.

Recommendation is low overall; online comments are the most hostile.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly say one missing line or style nit can zero an .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Short online terms report dozens of like a part-time job.

Format shift

Workload complaints are heaviest in online accelerated CIS10/CIS012.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Many describe boring or error-filled lectures, limited help, and instructions that do not match graded work.

Format shift

Online quality is worse; a few in-person students found lectures clearer.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grade is and final often weighted too low to recover zeros.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and weak teaching, though a few students say clear lectures and criteria can work if you only use class concepts.

Main concern

and tough grading still make it easy to lose points even when content is introductory.

What students said

“You will not get in an A in his class.”
CIS012
“ covered in class, learned this the hard way.”
CIS012
“Doesn't really teach and an but expects you to utilize them.”
CIS12

Remote format

Online

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CIS10/CIS012 reviews are overwhelmingly negative: , and lectures full of mistakes or repetition.

Main concern

and poor email help make online sections especially punishing.

What students said

“There are 102 assignments in his 6-week online course, and each assignment takes around 1-3 hours to complete.”
CIS10
“If you miss one line of code, he'll give you an F on the .”
CIS012
“Nearly 90% of the class dropped the class.”
CIS012

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams exist but comments focus more on ruthless .

Midterm and FinalAssignment-Heavy CourseLimited Partial Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly document proctoring software or open-book policy.

Test Heavy TagsIn-Person Coursework
“An unexcused absence, not looking at your work will simply give you a zero.”
CIS012

Online

Online students mention midterm and final but ; assignment zeros dominate risk.

Midterm and FinalHarsh Assignment Grading
“Midterm and grade.”
CIS012
“I got 92% for midterm but my total grade is 54%.”
CIS012

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He is terrible at responding to emails and will give you ZERO credit for an and ENTIRE weekend on.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (41 online, 9 in , and lecture quality. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

26/100

“Lectures were , boring, and needlessly repetitive. never explained or discussed in class.”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“Avoid this teacher at all costs. If he's the and transfer those credits to PCC if you really must go there.”

⚖️

18/100

“ . He behaves like the IRS and will audit your code which is why it takes months to receive a grade back.”

📚 Workload

12/100

“Very heavy workload for a 6-week course, with about 25 assignments per week requiring several hours of work daily, including weekends.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • 50% of his lecture is him struggling and making mistakes.
  • He spends over half the class time not even speaking while he stumbles on writing basic code.
  • Does not teach, grade, or do anything a normal professor does.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You will never satisfy this professor... you won't get an A in this class.
  • but won't tell you how to correct it.
  • If your code is too similar to a classmate, he will think you're cheating, 0%.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • , but doesn't solve anything; he just tells you that he can't help.
  • Horrible communication from his end and did.
  • One time emailed the professor about a concern only to receive disrespect and unprofessionalism in return.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

94

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews spanning years, and workload, and frequent specific assignment examples raise confidence despite some disputed positives.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 58
3 out of 512
2 out of 58
1 out of 542

Course coverage

CIS01231 reviews
CIS106 reviews
CIS126 reviews
CIS1123 reviews
CIS112ONLINE1 review
Show 3 more courses
CIS1651671 review
CIS350681 review
CS1121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 2 · A 11 · A- 2

B range

5

B 2 · B- 3

C range

7

C+ 2 · C 4 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

14

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 3