AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Lauren J Arenson

HUM2 · ANTH001L · ANT2 · ANTHR2512 · ANTH009 · ANTH2ONL · ANTH2 · HUMAN002 · ANTHRO1 · ANTH002 · ANTH1LONLINE · ANTH001ANTHLAB · ANTH001LAB · ANTH001 · HUMANITIES2 · HUM003 · 273 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
71.83%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will read weekly and write on time; if you want a zero-effort GE or need flexible deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy ReadingDiscussion EssaysOpen-Book ExamsNo Late WorkCaring but Strict
  • Expect lots of papers, and a few open-book exams.
  • and follow directions earn As and call her caring and inspiring.
  • on tiny details, and syllabus-topic mismatch in some HUMAN002 sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is common if you complete weekly writings and follow instructions, but points can be docked for length, citations, or tiny issues and .

Both formats agree effort is required; a few older online sections felt easier with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

, but volume of reading and writing keeps it from feeling free.

Online accelerated terms feel denser; high.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance is mixed by section; online is mostly deadline-driven, while .

Online flexibility is higher; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students recommend her for interesting material and care, with a .

Recommendation is strong in both formats when students accept the reading load.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Open-book exams and help, but weekly posts and unexplained nits.

Format shift

Tough-grader comments appear online and in person.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

, and exams add up, especially in short online terms.

Format shift

Online 6-8 week courses feel heaviest.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and , while critics cite Canvas quirks or topic mismatch in some Humanities offerings.

Format shift

Online quality is mostly ; a few HUMAN002 online complaints are sharper.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Weekly writings and and open-book or multiple-choice exams.

Format shift

Balance is similar online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students often praise passion, clarity, and , with and no late work.

Main concern

and strict deadlines still frustrate some writers.

What students said

“Lauren Arenson is amazing. It is my third time taking her class because everytime I see her !”
ANTH009
“ and open book.”
ANTH001
“she has an and will mark u off on unnamed/subjective/minute details.”
ANTH002

Remote format

Online

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online Anthro/Humanities is reading- and writing-heavy but usually fair if you follow directions; and help hard workers.

Main concern

, and late work is often refused.

What students said

“She wanted 1-2 pages in MLA format paper for a discussion post and 1 page MLA .”
ANTH009
“ , and a .”
ANTH009
“As long as you follow her directions and you will get an A.”
ANTH002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, so risk is lower than the heavy writing load suggests.

Open Book ExamsMultiple ChoiceWeekly Discussion PapersNo Late Work

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments also describe and limited total assignment counts.

Open Book MC ExamsEssay DiscussionsExtra Credit
“ and open book. If you pay attention to her lectures you should be able to get all 50 points.”
ANTH001
“ez exams but the .”
ANTH002

Online

Online students repeatedly , and writing-focused weeks.

Open Book ExamsDiscussion EssaysTimed MC Quizzes
“a .”
ANTH009
“all the .”
ANTH001
“We had four 50 question multiple choice quizzes with a 90 min time limit.”
ANTH001L

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Arenson is a gem. She really wants her students to be successful and leave her class knowing something... if you follow her directions, you'll get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (36 online, 14 in , and mostly positive effort-for-reward outcomes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Professor Lauren is amazing! She really cares for her students and I can really feel that she is also passionate about teaching.”

📚 Reading Load

38/100

“Be ready to do LOTS of readings, lectures and exams.”

🅰️ Grade Path

62/100

“Very easy A, just do the !”

👍 Recommendation

72/100

“You will not regret taking a class with her she's AMAZING.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her teaching style is very inspiring and caring.
  • She's very sweet and .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She doesn't accept late work though or offer any so make sure you stay on top of everything.
  • you will NEVER get 10/10 on an assignment.
  • If you put in the work I promise it becomes EASY A.

Theme 3

📖 About Workload

  • PREPARE TO ACTUALLY READ.
  • .
  • Lots of articles and documentaries you have to watch but overall very interesting.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

273

Lifetime ratings

83/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many Anthro and Humanities sections with recurring open-book and reading themes support medium-high confidence despite some curriculum-mismatch outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5120
4 out of 551
3 out of 545
2 out of 526
1 out of 531

Course coverage

ANTH00114 reviews
ANTH0027 reviews
HUMAN0027 reviews
ANTH0096 reviews
HUM23 reviews
Show 11 more courses
HUMANITIES23 reviews
ANT21 review
ANTH001ANTHLAB1 review
ANTH001L1 review
ANTH001LAB1 review
ANTH1LONLINE1 review
ANTH21 review
ANTH2ONL1 review
ANTHR25121 review
ANTHRO11 review
HUM0031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

33

A+ 6 · A 25 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5