AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Michelle Lee

ACCT1A · ACCT32044 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want real accounting rigor and will grind for exams; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest heavyAccounting career mentorHard but fair if you workAvoid online sectionExtra credit available
  • In-person students who put in serious study time can succeed and value her industry insight
  • Course is test-heavy; homework and
  • and weak support

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A is possible with , and exam prep, but and many students land B/C or lower.

Online makes the A and test weight; in-person still requires real effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Accounting content is dense, fast-moving, and repeatedly labeled difficult especially for first-timers.

Online reviews call it extremely hard; in-person is still challenging but more supported by board work.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

because the class moves fast and board work matters.

In-person students stress showing up; but engagement still matters.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

Recommended for serious accounting-bound students in person; .

In-person recommendations are far stronger than .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

Tough grader and test-heavy tags dominate; exists but .

Format shift

because HW/quizzes lose weight; .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of homework, reading, board practice, and .

Format shift

Both formats are work-heavy; online adds platform costs and proctored quizzes.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

and care; critics say she overcomplicates, embarrasses students, or explains poorly online.

Format shift

Teaching reputation is much better in person than online.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Large exams dominate the grade while homework and practice.

Format shift

Online and ; online also uses proctored quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person is still challenging and exam-driven, but board work, TAs, , and career connections help motivated students.

Main concern

Grade , and some students find her condescending or group-board-dependent.

What students said

“If you dedicate time towards the class its an easy A. I didn't, but you can.”
ACCT1A
“Your overall grade is .”
ACCT1A
“If you are looking for an easy A, she is not the professor for you but if you plan on going .”
ACCT1A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and weak Canvas support.

Main concern

Proctoring app plus paid book/access code and and stressful.

What students said

“ because she requires you to buy the book, access code, and a proctoring app”
ACCT1A
“25% of the way through the semester, HW and and grade .”
ACCT1A
“If you do .”
ACCT1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams drive the grade; online adds proctoring software, while and .

Test heavyProctored quizzes onlineIn-class board practiceHomework lightly weighted

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are high-stakes and central; homework is practice, board work helps, and .

Large examsBoard work practiceTests not taken home
“Your overall grade is .”
ACCT1A
“The tests have nothing unexpected but .”
ACCT1A

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention proctored quizzes, integrity controls, and .

Proctored quizzesPaid proctoring appTest-dominated grade
“The and have built-in controls to protect the integrity of the assignment.”
ACCT1A
“HW and and grade .”
ACCT1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are looking for an easy A, she is not the professor for you but if you plan on going .”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, weighting the online-versus-in-person split and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🧪

82/100

“Your overall grade is .”

💻 Online Warning

25/100

“ because she requires you to buy the book, access code, and a proctoring app”

🏢 Career Mentorship

70/100

“If you are remotely considering accounting, Michelle Lee is highly recommended because of her background and connections.”

📈 Effort Required

34/100

“If you dedicate time towards the class its an easy A. I didn't, but you can.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches in a way that really makes you understand, and offers so many resources
  • Her lectures are redundant, overcomplicates topics
  • She really cares about her students and whether they learn the material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The and the homework and
  • Made accounting harder than it need to be
  • Mean scores were almost all around 60-65%

Theme 3

💻 About Online vs In Person

  • if you can
  • and avoiding the wednesday hybrid format

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

21 reviews with strong format contrast and , though outcomes and tone remain mixed.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ACCT1A20 reviews
ACCT320441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1