AI Rate Professor

Linguistics

Karen Carlisi

ENG12 · ENGL1A · ESL33B · LING013 · ENGL12 · LING1272553 · LING012 · LINGUISTICS12 · ESL106 · LING12 · 82 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
78.13%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if and will keep up with homework.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed FeedbackCaring MentorGroup ProjectsLots of HomeworkClear Expectations
  • and accessibility help motivated students improve skills
  • Workload and participation demands can feel heavy especially in short terms
  • A few students find her direct style condescending while

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

As are common if you follow instructions and do the work, but slackers struggle.

Online and pure exam luck.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, yet reading, projects, and participation keep it from being trivial.

; limited online evidence is mixed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

as mandatory with roll, lateness penalties, and participation weight.

Evidence ; online sample is too small to contradict.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and support, tempered by workload and occasional personality clashes.

Online sample is strongly positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and ; not a free A, but fair when instructions are followed.

Format shift

Online students note grace periods; some in-person students call her tougher on grammar and rules.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, and papers make the load noticeable especially in 6-week terms.

Format shift

Online reviews also report many assignments; .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students praise passion, organization, and skill-building despite a minority finding her condescending.

Format shift

Online praise focuses on communication; in-person praise focuses on lectures and mentoring.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of homework, quizzes, group projects, midterms, and .

Format shift

Both formats blend assignments and tests; ESL sections lean more on papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person classes mix engaging intercultural discussion with mandatory participation and .

Main concern

Direct tone and heavy short-term workloads turn some students off.

What students said

“She is amazing! and dedicated to her students. .”
LING013
“This was an intense 6 week course but .”
LING012
“professor is extremely condescending, gives extreme attitude, is unprofessional in the way she handles criticism.”
LING12

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Small online sample praises communication, intro videos, grace periods, and .

Main concern

One review still reports lots of assignments and stress despite good support.

What students said

“She has AMAZING communication with her students. She gives a grace period with her assignments and offers .”
LING013
“She gives a lot of . This is the only class I was stressing about.”
LING012

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and tests track lectures and study guides; .

Study Guides Before TestsLecture-Aligned QuizzesGroup Final ActivitiesHomework-Driven Grade

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture review; homework and projects also matter.

Study GuidesQuiz Drops LowestGroup Projects
“Several easy quizzes w/study guide. if you read book/study.”
LING12
“She goes over the .”
ENGL12

Online

Limited online reviews .

Assignment HeavyFeedback on Submissions
“ . She gives a lot of .”
LING012

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to improve your English skills, this is the . She is the kind of professor who really cares about her students and wants everyone to do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“One of the !!! SO SAD that she is going to retire.”

📝

82/100

“the most helpful thing of her class which I really and comments on my paper.”

📚 Workload Reality

42/100

“Be prepared for a lot of homework and assignments, but trust me YOU WILL LEARN A LOT in this class.”

⚠️ Personality Split

55/100

“professor is extremely condescending, gives extreme attitude, is unprofessional in the way she handles criticism.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • engaging and passionate
  • Her lectures are VERY interactive
  • Creates welcoming environmnt for all dif. cultures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not a hard class but not extremely easy
  • You'll have to put in the work but you will also learn a lot!
  • Obtaining a great grade is doable

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very caring and dedicated to her students
  • super nice and caring
  • strict on tardiness

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

82

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years show stable themes of feedback and workload with a modest minority of personality complaints.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 561
4 out of 59
3 out of 55
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESL33B15 reviews
ENGL129 reviews
LING0129 reviews
LING128 reviews
LING0133 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ESL1062 reviews
ENG121 review
ENGL1A1 review
LING12725531 review
LINGUISTICS121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 3 · A 20 · A- 1

B range

5

B 5

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 5