AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Sashur Henninger-Rener

ANTHRO111 · ANTH002H · ANTH004 · ANTH001L · ANTH10199 · ANTH01 · ANTH1 · ANTH002 · ANTH001 · 88 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
61.8%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can follow instructions precisely and accept a heavy writing load for a GE anthropology class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardNitpicky APA graderHeavy writing loadResubmissions allowedAI accusation riskCaring but strict
  • , and APA details.
  • Workload is writing-heavy with weekly discussions, papers, and reading.
  • Students who follow rubrics exactly and use resubmissions often earn As; others feel graded unfairly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Many As appear when students follow rubrics and resubmit, but nitpicky formatting, zeros for small citation misses, and AI accusations make an A feel high-effort and risky.

Online reviews stress AI accusations and zeros; and no tests.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is GE-level and often called interesting rather than conceptually brutal, but and writing volume keep it from feeling easy.

Both formats emphasize volume of writing and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory and participation-heavy; .

In-person more often reports mandatory or ; as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

supporters love lectures and care, critics call her one of the and workload.

Online reviews are more polarized and ; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Tough grader tags dominate; , and alleged AI use even when students dispute it.

Format shift

Online comments more often cite zeros and AI accusations; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and short-term sessions that pile more work than other classes.

Format shift

Both formats report lots of papers; and summaries.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Passionate lectures and mental-health flexibility for fans, but , and condescension for others.

Format shift

In-person reviews more often praise lectures; online reviews .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and quizzes; several sections explicitly have no exams.

Format shift

; some online sections still use quizzes and occasional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person and honors sections praise interesting lectures and mental-health flexibility, but still report heavy writing, strict formatting, and occasional AI nitpicking; some .

Main concern

and formatting penalties that can tank .

What students said

“NO TESTS :))”
ANTH002H
“she is a , however, she allows resubmissions for full credit.”
ANTH002H
“Formatting the 30%.”
ANTH001

Remote format

Online

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are writing- and , and frequent tough-grader complaints, though some students call it an easy A if they follow directions and use .

Main concern

Nitpicky grading, AI accusations, and .

What students said

“ and .”
ANTH001
“Easy A if u meet deadlines and manage your time.”
ANTH001
“she falsely accused me of using AI and gave me a 0”
ANTH001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many sections replace traditional closed-book exams with papers, discussions, and but strict on writing.

Often no midterm/finalQuiz-based in some sectionsAssignment and paper heavyTurnitin on written work

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Several honors and seminar-style sections report no exams or .

No tests in some honors sectionsPaper and participation basedResubmissions allowed
“ . It was only just research papers”
ANTH002H
“NO TESTS :))”
ANTH002H

Online

, and quizzes with Turnitin; some older sections mention non-multiple-choice exams that need study notes.

Weekly discussions and quizzesTurnitin requiredOccasional written exams
“ . Resubmissions are allowed on hw and some .”
ANTH001
“beware that the and you will waste time if you don't study”
ANTH002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“pretty easy class but she grades really hard for a simple GE. she falsely accused me of using AI and gave me a 0”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (30 online, 20 in , and polarized recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

34/100

“Will nitpick at any and every and homeworks and will mark you off heavily for it.”

📝 Heavy Writing Workload

28/100

“Took her for a 16 week course and she had more work than all of my other classes combined.”

❤️

58/100

“ and an if you follow instructions.”

👍 Split Recommendation

58/100

“Honestly her class isn't worth the trouble. She !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are thorough w/o being overwhelming
  • she's definitely tougher than your average prof at pcc
  • Amazing lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A if u meet deadlines and manage your time
  • she is extremely difficult to get an A from

Theme 3

📝 About Writing and Formatting

  • She nitpicks margins and spacing like it's a crime
  • does use turnitin which is a hassle

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

88

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed recent reviews across online and in-person formats show a and writing load.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 511
3 out of 59
2 out of 55
1 out of 521

Course coverage

ANTH00127 reviews
ANTH0029 reviews
ANTH002H5 reviews
ANTH0044 reviews
ANTH001L1 review
Show 4 more courses
ANTH011 review
ANTH11 review
ANTH101991 review
ANTHRO1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 7 · A 20 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 4