AI Rate Professor

English

Tatyana Surenyan-Krech

ENGLISH14 · ENGL1A · ENG28 · ENG130 · ENGLISH1A · ENGL14 · ENGL005A · ENGL01 · ENG100 · ENGL001C · ENGL001B · ENG1C · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other option and can handle heavy writing with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude classroom toneTalks about personal lifeHeavy papers and readingHarsh late penaltiesExpensive self-published textbook
  • , and rude or dismissive responses to students.
  • and frequent essays, often with strict lateness and .
  • A minority report an easy pass if you write well and follow the rubric, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Some strong writers report an easy A if they follow the rubric, but .

Both formats report possible high grades if work is done, but online and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Content is not advanced theory, but and .

Online short terms intensify paper volume; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

for absences; online is more flexible but still assignment-heavy.

; many online reviews mark attendance as no or not provided.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Roughly one in , and the dominant student message is to run or if possible.

Negative tone dominates both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Students report large late penalties, zeros for absences, and .

Format shift

Harsh lateness and attendance penalties appear in both formats; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Expect lots of , and sometimes her own paid textbook.

Format shift

Online compressed terms especially stack weekly essays; .

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Most students say she rambles, plays old videos, rarely teaches writing clearly, and can be rude or dismissive.

Format shift

; online critiques focus on pre-recorded low-effort content.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and weekly writing rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize essays and discussions over formal tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews repeatedly claim she plays old videos, rambles about personal life, singles students out, and and lateness rules.

Main concern

Hostile or cold classroom climate and little actual writing instruction.

What students said

“Please RUN!”
ENGL001C
“i turn in and she deducted 20 points!”
ENG100
“just sits on facebook while it plays. The only time she actually talks is when she's rambling abt her personal life”
ENGL14

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students often , and the required self-published textbook plus weekly essays make the class feel low-effort from the instructor.

Main concern

and and harsh or unfair grading reports.

What students said

“All her content is pre-recorded for the online class so she doesn't need to do any teaching.”
ENGL001B
“If I could rate her a zero, I would. She completely ignored my disability”
ENGL001B
“She requires you to buy her self published $90. book that is only 100 pages.”
ENG28

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers and discussions; reviews do not clearly describe proctored or lockdown exams.

Essay-heavyWeekly papersDiscussionsLittle traditional testing mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and in-class essays more than formal exam software or proctoring.

So many papersIn-class essaysParticipation
“make sure you prepare .”
ENGL1A
“So ”
ENG100

Online

, and reading rather than proctored exams.

Weekly essaysDiscussionsLots of reading
“Wrote 5 papers over the 6 week course.”
ENGL001B
“ and so ”
ENGL001B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please RUN!”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews (10 online, 27 in person), highlighting climate, workload, and teaching gaps. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“she doesn't actually teach and still somehow have a job”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“ . She is a horrendous teacher.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“The work is not hard but it's a lot of reading and writing every week and not enough time.”

⚖️

24/100

“i turn in and she deducted 20 points!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just talks about her life and her sewing
  • post youtube vids from years ago as a lecture
  • talks about everything into Disney princesses crocheting

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • 20% deduction for late work
  • deducted 20 points! because it's one minute late

Theme 3

💔 About Classroom Climate

  • this class makes me seek therapy
  • answers in snarky/sarcastic tones

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-seven reviews spanning many years and both formats show a consistently negative majority with detailed examples.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 522

Course coverage

ENGL001B12 reviews
ENG1005 reviews
ENGL1A5 reviews
ENGL013 reviews
ENGL001C2 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGL005A2 reviews
ENGL142 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENG1301 review
ENG1C1 review
ENG281 review
ENGLISH141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 4 · A 10

B range

5

B+ 4 · B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 8 · Rather not say 1