AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Deanna Sanchez

PEDIATRICS · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

A standout nursing professor for Pediatrics if and can handle a real nursing workload.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDown to EarthExperienced ER NurseHilarious and CaringClinical GoldStudent-Centered Teaching
  • Five of six students rate her excellent and would take her again for Pediatrics.
  • Students praise real clinical wisdom, humor, and genuine care for students and patients.
  • One critic calls her arrogant and , so bedside manner is not unanimous.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Students pass and often earn A or B+, but Pediatrics is still treated as real nursing work rather than a free A.

All grade evidence is in person; no online comparison exists.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is engaging and practical, yet difficulty ratings and nursing clinicals keep it at standard challenge.

Only in-person Pediatrics reviews inform difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

, as expected in nursing theory and clinicals.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students call her a gem of the program and .

Recommendation evidence is in person only and strongly positive overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

One tag says graded by few things, and outcomes are solid, but nothing shows free or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Students enjoy class and clinicals without calling the load featherlight, matching normal nursing intensity.

Format shift

Workload signals come only from in-person Pediatrics.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Nearly all reviews praise her experience, humor, engagement, and genuine care for students and patients.

Format shift

Teaching praise is in person only, with one arrogance complaint.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Students mention theory, clinicals, and .

Format shift

Assessment detail is limited and all in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person Pediatrics students mostly call her funny, knowledgeable, and .

Main concern

A minority report attitude issues when asking about expectations or exams.

What students said

“Dr. Sanchez is literally the ! She is a gem and very knowledgeable and caring about her students.”
Pediatrics
“She's an awesome ER RN who teaches peds—down to earth, experienced, and gives great advice.”
Pediatrics
“She's arrogant and it reflects on her interactions with students.”
Pediatrics

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and expectations but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring software, or .

Exams MentionedClinical and Theory MixGraded by Few Things

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and course expectations without spelling out proctoring or open-book policies.

ExamsClinical ApplicationTheory Lectures
“You can barely ask her about the expectations of the course or .”
Pediatrics
“She really made clinicals and theory so informative and I enjoyed her classes.”
Pediatrics

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. because she is genuine and cares about the well being of students and patients.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person Pediatrics nursing reviews, highlighting care, clinical expertise, and one tone concern. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Dr. Sanchez is literally the ! She is a gem and very knowledgeable and caring about her students.”

❤️ Student Care

92/100

“She's a well experience nurse and professor with a wealth of knowledge.”

😂 Classroom Energy

88/100

“Prof Sanchez is the and very understanding with her students.”

⚠️ Minority Concern

30/100

“She's arrogant and it reflects on her interactions with students.”

Theme 1

👨‍⚕️ About Clinical Teaching

  • She's an awesome ER RN who teaches peds—down to earth, experienced, and gives great advice.
  • Her lectures and engaging.
  • She really made clinicals and theory so informative

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • I love her, and wish more professors could be like her.
  • Very nice professor, super chill
  • She's a well experience nurse and professor with a wealth of knowledge.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • You can barely ask her about the expectations of the course or .
  • the experience was disappointing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Six consistent recent in-person nursing reviews provide a , though the sample is still modest and single-course focused.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Pediatrics6 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1