AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Jamie Vilos

ANTH77162 · ANTH001L · ANTHRO101 · ANTH001A · ANTHRO1 · ANTH001 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
46.43%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you will attend, study hard for exams, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate but polarizingTest heavyTough graderLecture heavyExtra credit available
  • Students split hard between passionate engaging lectures and rude or harsh treatment.
  • if you bomb a test.
  • and study guides help engaged students, but if you need leniency.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

An A is possible with steady attendance and , but and recovery options are thin.

Online students more often report workable As; and failed recoveries.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is intro anthro for many, yet lecture volume, memorization, and .

Online can feel intensive without science background; in person is often called lecture and test heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

up, and several tags warn skipping will tank the grade.

In-person evidence is strongly mandatory; a few online or but are minority.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

fans praise passion and structure while critics call her the .

Online reviews skew more recommend; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and little curve leave small room for recovery after weak exams.

Format shift

Online is somewhat softer with and feedback; in person is often called a stickler.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, but heavy lectures, papers, labs, and .

Format shift

Online labs and quizzes add steady work; in person is more lecture and test focused.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Passion and , but dry lectures, passive-aggressive tone, and help-seeking friction drag scores down.

Format shift

Online teaching comments are warmer overall than the divided in-person tone.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Multiple reviews say tests dominate the grade while .

Format shift

; labs add practical exams in some sections.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some love her passion and study guides, while many warn of , and a harsh tone.

Main concern

and uncomfortable classroom tone for some.

What students said

“All the and the study guide tells you everything you need to know for the test”
ANTH001
“ !”
ANTHRO1
“She can be rude at times and passive aggressive”
ANTH001

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are , and manageable modules when students watch lectures.

Main concern

Quiz volume and pace can stack on the same day.

What students said

“I don't know why Professor Vilos has such a bad rating here. She is a good professor”
ANTH001L
“ ”
ANTH001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and ; study guides help, but failing a .

Test heavyMultiple choice examsDetailed study guidesLab practicalsLittle grade recovery

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In and finals that outweigh other work, plus some lab practicals.

Midterm and final heavyLab practicalsStudy guidesMultiple choice exams
“Extremely test-heavy, if you fail the ”
ANTH001
“3 multiple choice exams, super easy with a detailed study guide”
ANTH001
“Two of the ”
ANTH001L

Online

Online comments describe stacked quizzes, lecture-based exams, and .

Many quizzesLecture-based examsExtra credit
“She crams a lot of ”
ANTH001
“ ”
ANTH001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a really dope professor, very knowledgeable and extremely passionate about the topic. Not very lenient at all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, , and strict policies. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Her energy is infectious and makes the class so much fun.”

👎 Polarized Reputation

44/100

“ !”

📝

34/100

“Extremely test-heavy, if you fail the .”

⚖️

28/100

“Not lenient with late work and only lectures.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very passionate about the topic
  • lectures are dry that you want to fall asleep
  • She can be rude at times and passive aggressive

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if you can answer everything on the study guide you will do well
  • No patience to students who need help
  • You're

Theme 3

🧪 About Workload and Labs

  • Lots of lectures but they were all very interesting
  • wrong

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

28 detailed and polarized reviews over several years provide a consistent split picture of passion versus harshness.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ANTH00117 reviews
ANTH001L4 reviews
ANTHRO14 reviews
ANTH001A1 review
ANTH771621 review
Show 1 more courses
ANTHRO1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 4 · A 11

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1