AI Rate Professor

Library Technology

Linda Stewart

LIB120 · LIB121 · LIB122 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Avoid if you can; if the archives program forces you and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProGet Ready To ReadOutdated MaterialsDisorganized ModulesSole Program InstructorSweet But Uninspiring
  • Most students find lectures dry, outdated, or .
  • and weak engagement dominate Library Technology courses.
  • You may have no choice if you are in the digital archives program.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some call grades almost automatic, while others report tough grading, incomplete, or withdrawal after weak support.

Online includes both brain-dead easy A and ; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is intro-level but and new archival concepts make it feel harder than expected.

; in-person stresses dry volume and weak examples.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as no, yes, or not provided with no single consistent policy.

; in-person has both mandatory and optional flags.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Take-again sits near 38% and many students warn about outdated lectures and limited empathy.

Older in-person praise exists, but recent online reviews are mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

One student says As are effortless; and report poor recovery after weak assignments.

Format shift

Online is more split .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and modules that force constant backtracking.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students often call her kind yet uninspiring, with outdated videos and .

Format shift

Online complaints about ancient materials are strongest; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

34/100

Reading, exercises, quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students split between valuing her field experience and calling the , and unhelpful.

Main concern

95+ pages of and low inspiration.

What students said

“Be prepared to read 95+ pgs of extremely dry + outdated articles each week.”
LIB120
“Ms. Stewart designs exercises to practice real applications of concepts, which is invaluable for the job field.”
LIB122

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online modules feel disorganized with , and mixed easy-vs-tough grading.

Main concern

and materials that feel outdated.

What students said

“She uses ancient videos and articles rather than her own PowerPoints or videos, so the class is never fun or engaging.”
LIB120
“Vague, unemotive, and unempathetic.”
LIB122
“You would pretty much have to be brain dead to not earn an A in one of her classes.”
LIB122

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes feeding the final but .

Quizzes On FinalReading HeavyHomework Exercises

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice exercises more than exam logistics.

Practice ExercisesReading Based
“Ms. Stewart designs exercises to practice real applications of concepts, which is invaluable for the job field.”
LIB122

Online

; proctoring is not clearly described.

Quizzes On FinalModule Work
“ as they'll probably be on the final.”
LIB121

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She uses ancient videos and articles rather than her own PowerPoints or videos, so the class is never fun or engaging.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, balancing recent online frustration with . Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Her teaching style is neither dynamic nor inspiring. I found her completely discouraging and unhelpful.”

📖 Workload Reality

28/100

“Be prepared to read 95+ pgs of extremely dry + outdated articles each week.”

😕 Support Gap

34/100

“If you reach out to your professor with a long-concerned message and they say "I'll see what I can do" on top of ignoring another request for clarification, then maybe that's not a professor you should be taking.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her "lectures" SUCK
  • materials and lectures feel somewhat outdated
  • neither dynamic nor inspiring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You would pretty much have to be brain dead to not earn an A
  • Get ready to read
  • I never felt I truly learned anything

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Prof , and knowledgable
  • She's sweet
  • always willing to help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed reviews over several years show a consistent negative teaching tone, though grade outcomes and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 51

Course coverage

LIB1204 reviews
LIB1223 reviews
LIB1211 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1