AI Rate Professor

Design

Steven Gartz

MIT101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you can; students treat him like a once-in-a-lifetime design professor.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAbsolute GOATHilarious and kindFlexible deadlinesGives good feedbackInspirational
  • Students call him the and want to take every class with him.
  • Low difficulty with flexible deadlines if you put in the work.
  • as mandatory but the and fun.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Reported grades are A-range and deadlines are flexible if you complete the work.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Difficulty ratings sit around 1-2 and students describe the class as approachable and enjoyable.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

and call him the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Students report A-range grades and flexible deadlines when effort is shown.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

Difficulty is low and no .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students , and inspiration.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize feedback and ongoing work more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

tutorials, and flexible deadlines.

Main concern

.

What students said

“This guys is the . I have nothing but good things to say about him, by far the ”
MIT-101
“Flexible on deadlines as long as you are doing the work. 10/10”
MIT-101
“Hilarious, kind, and dedicated, Steven is a great teacher who inspires his students.”
MIT-101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This guys is the . I have nothing but good things to say about him, by far the and probably will ever have.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching warmth and low stress. Credibility rating: Low.

🌟 Teaching Quality

98/100

“by far the and probably will ever have”

😂 Personality & Vibe

95/100

“He is very silly and kind, but professional and experienced as well.”

👍 Recommendation

98/100

“If I could learn alll my classes from him I would.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All of his tutorial videos are Incredibly well organised and well made.
  • He is Intelligent and actually cares about his students.
  • Steven is a great teacher who inspires his students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Flexible on deadlines as long as you are doing the work.
  • Very approachable and likable.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Hilarious, kind, and dedicated
  • Absolute baller
  • Respected

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

; tone is highly consistent but the sample is small.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MIT-1013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1