AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Salvador Pineda

ENGR14 · ENGR011 · ENGR014 · ENGR13 · ENGR11 · ENGL010 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
38.46%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you are self-driven, track Canvas carefully, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest heavy curvesConfusing CanvasPicky homework formatSelf-study powerpointsMixed grading fairness
  • and frustrating organization or teaching.
  • Exams and ; and problem discussions matter.
  • Many warn of , and little emergency flexibility.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Curves and open-note exams help, but , and heavy quiz weight still demand real work.

; in-person complains more about fairness and prep.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Engineering content is conceptual and test-driven, with students calling material hard and lectures unhelpful.

Both formats rate difficulty high; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

and problem discussions; others online report no seat-time requirement.

In-person more often mandatory; online more flexible but deadline-driven.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

and comment tone are weak, with many telling others not to enroll unless forced.

A minority online and and clarity.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

40/100

, but homework accuracy, format pickiness, and .

Format shift

Open-note online exams with .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and tests stack up and dominate the semester.

Format shift

Online still has lots of reading and timed assessments.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some find powerpoints and office hours useful, but , and disorganized.

Format shift

and in-person boredom both lower the score.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes and , with homework and problem discussions supporting them.

Format shift

One review notes quizzes and exams about 55 percent of the grade.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are more , and weak exam prep, though and clear expectations.

Main concern

, and minimal real exam preparation.

What students said

“Absolutely no effort in making study guides or . Teaches all the way up to the .”
ENGR011
“ (70% actual grade -> 100% in the gradebook).”
ENGR014
“The way . I never knew when things were expected to actually be done.”
ENGR14

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report helpful powerpoints for some, but , and mixed enjoyment.

Main concern

Lecture and heavy self-study.

What students said

“Tests are difficult but . , but helpful. If you put in the effort, you can get a good grade.”
ENGR13
“His lecture .”
ENGR11
“Tests and and you really need to know what you are doing to do well. .”
ENGR13

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are hard but , and loosely tied to homework-style problems.

Curved examsOpen note online examsShort test windowsSimilar to homework/problem discussions

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students say exams resemble problem discussions and , and lack strong study-guide prep.

Exams similar to problem discussionsCurved examsLowest test replaced by finalWeak exam prep
“exams , and class works. .”
ENGR014
“Absolutely no effort in making study guides or .”
ENGR011
“ and .”
ENGR11

Online

Online comments support difficult timed quizzes and ; some open-note practice is mentioned by students who took his exams online.

Difficult timed testsGood curvesLittle time windowsHomework-like exams
“ but .”
ENGR13
“Tests and and you really need to know what you are doing to do well. .”
ENGR13
“ (70% actual grade -> 100% in the gradebook).”
ENGR014

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 , and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Polarized Teaching

38/100

“his lecture is way too bored, he always teach from the book which you can just read on your own.”

📊

55/100

“ (70% actual grade -> 100% in the gradebook).”

🗂️

30/100

“The way .”

🧪

35/100

“quizzes and exams makes up 55% of grade, don't miss any PD”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lecture .
  • .
  • Lectures were boring and slow.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but .
  • and unfair most of the time.
  • If you put in the effort, you can get a good grade.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Ops

  • Absolutely no effort in making study guides or .
  • I never knew when things were expected to actually be done.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 13 reviews with polarized opinions limit confidence, though and organization issues recur.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGR0143 reviews
ENGR113 reviews
ENGR133 reviews
ENGR0112 reviews
ENGL0101 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGR141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2