AI Rate Professor

English

Angelica Duran

ENG100ENG1A · ENG1A · ENG1 · ENGL1A · B · ENGLISH1A · 1A · ENGL001A · ENG1B · ENGLISH85 · ENGLISH · ENG100 · ENGLISH1 · ENGL001B · 73 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
22.58%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless and ; most students report a frustrating experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderDisorganizedHeavy Reading LoadUnclear InstructionsPolarizing
  • Many students call her disorganized with and .
  • , and As costly even when content is introductory English.
  • A minority praise her kindness and revision chances, but overall recommendation rate is very low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students earn As with revision and effort, but tough grading, few high-stakes items, and .

; in-person reviews mix tough grader tags with occasional revision leniency.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Content is standard English composition but , and unclear structure make it feel harder than it should.

Both formats emphasize heavy reading; online modules and short terms intensify confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tie participation and presence to the grade.

; online reviews usually treat attendance as not required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Would-take-again is around 23% and .

Both online and smaller set of positive outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; students report harsh essay marks and unclear rubrics.

Format shift

Online ; in-person feedback is mixed but still often strict.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Lots of , and group work appear often.

Format shift

Online short terms still stack multiple essays and projects; and participation.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Average quality near 2.9 with frequent complaints of tangents, unprepared lectures, and .

Format shift

Negative teaching comments appear in both formats; a minority of and helpful.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grade centers , and presentations more than timed exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy; online comments specify multiple essays and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are strongly polarized but lean negative: , and tough grading dominate recent comments.

Main concern

and harsh or and participation demands.

What students said

“She was genuinely an awful professor. She was particular in what she wanted but did not further elaborate.”
ENG1A
“Worst teacher ”
ENG1B
“I don't think prof Angelica is a your work+ feedback.”
ENG1B

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report harsh essay grading, delayed feedback, confusing modules, and high workload in short sessions.

Main concern

Unclear directions and .

What students said

“ and as well.”
ENG1B
“Spare yourself and teach.”
ENG1B
“She gives a lot of tedious work and grades pretty harshly.”
ENGL001A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are mainly essays and presentations with .

Essay FinalsPresentationsReading-Based WritingLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as essay plus presentation; little evidence of strict proctoring software.

Essay Plus PresentationRevisions AllowedParticipation Graded
“ .”
ENG1B
“We completed two 500-word essays, two group presentations... and a revision of one of the 500-word essays as .”
ENG1B

Online

Online comments focus on essays, group projects, and discussions rather than proctored exams.

Multiple EssaysGroup ProjectDiscussions
“We had a total of 4 essays,1 group project, and a couple discussions.”
ENG1B
“We had a total of three short essays (500 words) and a big research paper.”
ENGL001A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Worst teacher ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and , and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

24/100

“ .”

📚 Heavy Workload

26/100

“I felt like she thought she was my only class and demanded too much”

🧭 Organization Issues

34/100

“ and unorganized.”

❤️ Occasional Care

55/100

“Was also very easy to communicate with and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She will go on long tangents that are not related to our learning.
  • Her lectures were scattered & didn't teach the material at all.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She grades incredibly harsh especially on essays!
  • It isn't hard to get an A in her class.

Theme 3

🗂️ About Organization

  • Right from the start of the .
  • the and confusing
  • She didn't have a concrete grading scheme until the weekend before the final

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

73

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews span many years with consistent themes of disorganization and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 59
3 out of 58
2 out of 512
1 out of 522

Course coverage

ENG1A13 reviews
ENG1B8 reviews
ENG1006 reviews
ENG15 reviews
ENGLISH13 reviews
Show 10 more courses
1A2 reviews
ENG100ENG1A2 reviews
ENGL001A2 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
506611 review
B1 review
ENGL001B1 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH851 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 2 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 7

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 4