AI Rate Professor

Art History

Denise Johnson

ART004C · ART001B · ART004D · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
43.48%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and can handle mandatory participation and uneven professionalism.

Best fit · Effort For RewardParticipation HeavyPolarizing PersonalityResearch Papers FocusCondescending Tone RiskEngaging Lectures (Split)
  • Reviews split hard between inspiring, caring mentor and .
  • Course centers on lectures, participation, and .
  • Attendance is usually mandatory and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students report A or A- grades, but participation, papers, and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, but , and participation keep it from feeling free.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and absences for illness reportedly hurt grades.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

About half praise her as outstanding; the other half call her unprofessional and advise avoiding her.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some call her an easy grader who rewards effort; and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Not endless busywork, but , and participation add up over the term.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Strong lectures and mentorship for some students; fact errors, boring delivery, and demeaning tone for others.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Main , and participation rather than a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some students love engaging lectures and paper scaffolding; many , and .

Main concern

Personality and organization complaints can make class feel hostile even when grades are fine.

What students said

“PLEASE READ! I actually learned so much from Prof Johnson. I feel that her score is really unfair.”
ART001B
“Honestly one of the . She was so weird towards people who participated and was so condescending.”
ART001B
“Professor Johnson was one of the finest professors I've ever had.”
ART004C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on papers and open-note quizzes more than high-stakes closed exams, though .

Open-Note QuizzesResearch Paper FocusParticipation GradedLate Feedback Risk

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; major work is analysis and research papers supported by lectures.

Open-Note QuizzesResearch PaperParticipation
“ , but took me an hour or two. Just pay attention to the lectures for the quizzes.”
ART004D
“The main focus of the course was an and presentation, and .”
ART004C

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I'm baffled by any student that has claimed to . ! They're hilarious, passionate, approachable”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization in teaching and professionalism. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“One of the most engaging and thoughtful professors I've had.”

⚠️ Professionalism Concerns

35/100

“This professor is highly unprofessional. .”

👍 Recommendation Split

43/100

“ ! .”

📝 Assessment Style

32/100

“The main focus of the class was working on an ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • Participation matters
  • Lectures are exciting and engaging

Theme 2

😤 About Tone & Fairness

  • Talks down to students
  • Condescending
  • 0 empathy at all

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Work

  • So many papers
  • Grades everything in the end of the semester

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

23 recent, detailed in-person reviews with ; good sample size but conflicting narratives lower certainty.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ART001B9 reviews
ART004C7 reviews
ART004D7 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 2 · A 9 · A- 4

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1