AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jonathan Miller

REL002 · RELG003 · PHIL1 · PHIL025 · PHIL25 · PHIL001 · RELG001 · PHILO25 · RELG2 · PHIL003 · RELG002 · RELG02 · PHIL025H · LOGIC101 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
78.79%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you will show up and read; he is one of the strongest philosophy options for fair grades and engaging lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing LecturesExtra Credit KingParticipation HeavyOrganizedFunny & Approachable
  • Clear weekly structure with .
  • , but lectures make dense philosophy/religion material digestible.
  • Attendance and participation matter, yet most students still land strong grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

83/100

Quizzes and papers are regular, but abundant and who keep up.

Nearly all Easy A evidence is in-person; the lone online review contradicts that pattern.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

, though readings can be long and philosophy still needs attention.

; online evidence is too scarce.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly graded, and and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Most students , and and religion.

; one online review is an .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students describe fair grading plus frequent that .

Format shift

Leniency is well supported in person; .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Expect some courses, and regular participation.

Format shift

In-person workload is consistent and predictable; online sample is insufficient.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

, and well structured week to week.

Format shift

Excellence is an in-person consensus; the single online review disagrees.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Daily quizzes, participation, papers, midterm, and top.

Format shift

; online details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students overwhelmingly praise organized lectures, humor, participation culture, and that makes high grades reachable.

Main concern

lazy students.

What students said

“Although there's a quiz/writing assignment every class, they're not hard as long as you've done the reading, and there's more than enough to pass with an A”
PHIL001
“Awesome professor! Dr. and patient”
PHIL001
“Dr. Miller is perhaps the ”
RELG002

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is strongly negative about Zoom lecture style and grading, so online evidence is too thin to generalize.

Main concern

One harsh online review claims boring Zoom lectures and .

What students said

“You will sit for literally 2 hours in a ZOOM class and listen to the MOST boring lectures... on top of that he does NOT follow logic and is a ”
RELG002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are frequent but and study guides, not described as webcam lockdown exams.

Daily QuizzesIndividual then Group QuizzesMidterm and FinalEssay QuestionsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, midterms/finals, and essays, with study guides and extra credit softening the load.

Daily QuizzesGroup Quiz SoftenersMidterm and FinalEssay QuestionsStudy Guides
“There are quizzes every day of class, but do not let that intimidate you”
PHIL001
“The , which softened the blow”
PHIL025
“His tests are very long, with 3 essay questions”
REL002

Online

One online review ; it mainly criticizes Zoom lecture quality and tough grading.

Zoom Lectures
“You will sit for literally 2 hours in a ZOOM class and listen to the MOST boring lectures”
RELG002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Miller is perhaps the . He not only know his subject material but is also very inspirational and passionate.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting lectures, grading safety nets, and participation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Professor Miller always keeps the class dynamic and engaging and makes sure the and understood.”

🎁 Safety Net

83/100

“there's more than enough to pass with an A”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ philosophy class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His passion is contagious
  • , and engaging
  • He really breaks down the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you do the reading and attend the lectures, you are sure to succeed
  • Offers a lot of towards the end of the semester
  • If you are lazy, this class might not be for you

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • The sweetest guy with the most open ideals
  • Great sense of humor, dry/sarcastic in a good way
  • Outside of class he is very approachable and amenable

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

38 reviews with a large recent sample, rich detail, and .

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL00111 reviews
PHIL0256 reviews
RELG0025 reviews
PHIL025H4 reviews
PHIL252 reviews
Show 9 more courses
REL0022 reviews
LOGIC1011 review
PHIL0031 review
PHIL11 review
PHILO251 review
RELG0011 review
RELG0031 review
RELG021 review
RELG21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 9 · A 16

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

2

C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1