AI Rate Professor

Library Technology

Christina Sheldon

LIB102 · LIB001 · COLLEGE1 · LIB002 · LIB003 · LIB011 · LIBRARY001 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
17.86%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you need library skills and can , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderRude feedbackLots of homeworkNo late workHarsh and strict
  • Most students call her extremely tough, rude, or condescending with little empathy.
  • , and research for often low-unit library courses.
  • A and professional standards, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

26/100

Some earn A with heavy effort, but and she rarely rounds or accepts late work.

Online and ; and citation intensity.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Library , and strict citation rules for few units.

and papers; in-person adds more interpersonal stress.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

messaging and locked doors if late.

In-person is stricter on presence; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

; most say rude tone and .

Negative tone is strong in both formats; a few online students still praise clarity and feedback.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

, and nitpicking that blocks full credit.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and research templates for often 1-unit style classes.

Format shift

Online reviews stress papers and reading; and projects.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

A and professional, but most describe rude, unhelpful, condescending teaching.

Format shift

In-person reviews focus more on rudeness; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Assessment centers on papers, research templates, projects, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and assignments; some also mention tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews emphasize , and unforgiving grading.

Main concern

Classroom climate and .

What students said

“ . Terrible professor that she makes her students miserable.”
LIB001
“A really rude teacher from the start, she will go off on you for the smallest things.”
LIB001
“Very knowledgeable but really bad people skills. Incredibly rude and .”
LIB002

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and gatekeeping on adds.

Main concern

and rude tone make small online library units high-stress.

What students said

“She is the and and condescending. Avoid.”
LIB001
“Nearly impossible to get full marks because she will nitpick at every little thing.”
LIB001
“ , and I wish she had recorded the first day's hour.”
LIB102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; exams are less central than papers and projects.

Paper heavyClear grading criteriaNo late workTough on citations

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment is described as harsh on papers, projects, and tests with little leniency.

So many papersTough graderTest heavyNo rounding
“No late work nor rounding the grades.”
LIB001
“ . No rounding of grades if you have 89.5 which is a B according to her.”
LIB001

Online

Online work centers on citations, research templates, and .

Lots of homeworkCitation rulesNo late workNitpicky grading
“ so you know what you need to do to get an A.”
LIB001
“Does not accept late work, even if you have trouble.”
LIB001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is so difficult. She is the and and condescending. Avoid.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 mixed-format library reviews, highlighting tone, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Climate

24/100

“A really rude teacher from the start, she will go off on you for the if possible.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ . Terrible professor that she makes her students miserable.”

📝

16/100

“Nearly impossible to get full marks because she will nitpick at every little thing.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“She gives so and her class is only 1 unit.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgeable but really bad people skills.
  • She treats her students condescendingly, speaking in an arrogant manner.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No late work nor rounding the grades.
  • a way to fail you.
  • For a 1 unit .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Extremely rude and disrespectful.
  • Inconsistent with grading and plain disrespectful spewing out micro aggressions.
  • uNCARING & UNSYMPATHETIC.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine reviews across many years and both formats are detailed and consistently negative on tone and grading.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 521

Course coverage

LIB00113 reviews
LIB0025 reviews
LIB1024 reviews
COLLEGE13 reviews
LIB0032 reviews
Show 2 more courses
LIB0111 review
LIBRARY0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2