AI Rate Professor

English

Isabela Riedel

ENGL001C · ENGLISH1A · ENG1C · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you and strict structure; most students advise taking someone else.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSo many papersHeavy reading loadHarsh or picky gradingGroup work every classPolarized personality
  • constant papers, reading, and little in-class work time.
  • Some students find her caring and helpful; others call her rude and unhelpful.
  • Grades can still be high with huge effort, but recommendation rate is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Many still get As only after brutal weekly essays and reading; harsh or .

In-person dominates; online single A with encouragement.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and high difficulty ratings make the content and pace demanding.

In-person especially hard; online still rated difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and leaving-class rules.

In-person mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and frequent stay-away warnings outweigh the minority of glowing personal praise.

Online positive outlier; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tough or be high after heavy effort.

Format shift

Harsh tags mainly in-person; .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

So , and weekly essay-level work leave little breathing room.

Format shift

Overwhelming in person; online still hard but less detailed.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Split between spectacular caring lessons and boring, rude, or .

Format shift

Online more positive; in-person mixed to negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment is paper- and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and uneven communication; a few praise kindness and engagement.

Main concern

, and sometimes rude or unclear direction.

What students said

“Assigns an UNGODLY amount of hw and I was struggling to keep up all semester.”
ENGLISH1A
“If it!!”
ENGLISH1A
“she assigns an ungodly amount of work and doesn't even give any time to work on them in class”
ENGL001C

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single positive online review praises encouragement and writing advice despite hard English content.

Main concern

Only one online review, so reliability is limited.

What students said

“English courses are not easy for me but she gave lots of encouragement and writing advice! Very nice!”
ENGLISH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course stress comes from continuous papers and .

Heavy paper writingWeekly essaysReading-based group workTextbook required

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group work rather than formal exam security.

So many papersLots of homeworkGroup projects every class
“We basically had to do a . PURE TORTURE.”
ENGLISH1A
“The course books were interesting, keep up with the readin or you wont pass”
ENGL001C

Online

Online review emphasizes writing advice and encouragement without describing proctored exams.

Writing-focusedFeedback on writing
“she gave lots of encouragement and writing advice! Very nice!”
ENGLISH1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“STAY AWAY. Assigns an UNGODLY amount of hw and I was struggling to keep up all semester. We basically had to do a . PURE TORTURE.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting extreme workload, mixed demeanor, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

15/100

“She assigns way too much work.”

❤️ Split on Personality

48/100

“ , and always willing to help students succeed.”

🚫 Low Recommendation

30/100

“If it!!”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • ungodly amount of work
  • So many papers

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Tone

  • she talks in a very slow and uninteresting way
  • She is also rude and is strict about phones

Theme 3

💵 About Materials

  • makes you bring the textbook to every class that is like $150 just to rent

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews with rich detail and consistent workload complaints, but mixed personality takes and only one online sample.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGLISH1A6 reviews
ENG1C2 reviews
ENGL001C2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1