AI Rate Professor

Art

Albert Yu

ART15 · ART18 · 33B · RENDERING · DM012 · ART33B · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want serious art growth and fair reward for effort, especially for digital painting or design prep.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives Good FeedbackInspirationalEffort-Based GradingClear TutorialsArt Center Prep
  • , and improvement-focused grading.
  • Easy A if you show effort and complete work; not hand-holding for passive students.
  • A few students dislike rushed lectures and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many A and A+ outcomes and comments say effort and improvement are rewarded more than raw talent.

; in-person still easy with consistent effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is approachable with demos and tutorials, but skill growth and .

Online software steps feel easiest; advanced studio sections expect more self-direction.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

some sections optional, others mandatory with no early leave after work is done.

Online is more flexible; several in-person reviews report mandatory stay-for-class policies.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

About 80% would take again and most students call him inspiring and highly useful for portfolio growth.

; in-person has a few low ratings about pace and tone.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

and completed projects rather than perfection.

Format shift

Online comments explicitly call him a .

Workload

Moderate

68/100

Project timelines are usually reasonable, but serious art progress still means steady studio work.

Format shift

Both formats report manageable assignment windows when students stay on schedule.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

, and encouragement stand out, with only occasional notes about rushed or dull delivery.

Format shift

Online tutorials score especially high; critics.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment is almost entirely projects and studio improvement rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is seen as inspirational and helpful for motivated art students, with occasional complaints about rushed demos and not letting students leave early.

Main concern

Independent work pace and strict stay-until-end attendance can frustrate students seeking more structure.

What students said

“If he sees you pushing yourself, he will give you that attention and encourage you.”
DM012
“If you are someone who is expecting to be hand-held in classes, you will not enjoy this class.”
ART33B
“He will not let students leave early even if and have no missing work.”
DM012

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online sections are highly praised for , and beginner-friendly software guidance.

Main concern

Success still depends on completing projects and .

What students said

“All the steps are very clear, even people who have never been exposed to software can still get high scores.”
DM012
“My art improved a lot not only because of Al's easy to understand tutorials, but also because of the encouragement he gives.”
ART15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Courses are graded on projects and growth with .

Project BasedFeedback on All ProjectsNo Traditional ExamsImprovement Focused

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and visible improvement rather than tests.

Project BasedImprovement FocusedStudio Work
“He grades you by your improvement.”
ART15
“make sure to show him your improvement and efforts,then you can an A easily.”
ART15

Online

Online work is assignment and tutorial driven with and .

Project BasedClear Step TutorialsFeedback on Assignments
“ with him about your shortcomings.”
DM012

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you take art seriously you will love this class. The professor really takes his time to go over assignments and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting feedback-driven art instruction and . Credibility rating: High.

🎨 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Albert is brilliant! His demos are beyond incredible!”

📈 Effort Rewarded

82/100

“He grades you by your improvement.”

💬

90/100

“He gives very clear instructions, and help.”

👍 Strong Recommendation

84/100

“An if you want to do industrial design/trans design.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His demos are beyond incredible!
  • Easy to follow his youtube tutorials.
  • but a bit on the dull side.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you get left behind, all the videos and lectures are in Canvas.
  • Cares more about effort & commitment than talent.
  • even people who have never been exposed to software can still get high scores.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Pace

  • His style of teaching was too quick, and class lecture felt incredibly rushed.
  • He will not let students leave early even if .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

19 reviews from 2006-2026 show consistent feedback , and portfolio support.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

DM0128 reviews
ART154 reviews
ART183 reviews
ART33B2 reviews
33B1 review
Show 1 more courses
RENDERING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 7 · A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1