AI Rate Professor

Speech

Joshua Fleming

SPCH01 · SPCH001 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless ; the single online rave is not enough to trust.

Best fit · Self Taught ProJoke-heavy lecturesUnfair group competitionPicky gradingOften absentMixed online vs in-person
  • In-person students report weak teaching, jokes over substance, and .
  • yet several say he skipped class or failed to teach.
  • One online review is strongly positive, creating a sharp format split.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Grades range from D- to A+, but and when content feels light.

Online rater earned an A easily; and one D-.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty scores swing from 1 to 5; content is speech basics but uneven delivery and group competition raise the real challenge.

Online called it easier (diff 2); two in-person ratings marked difficulty 5.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

while value from being present is disputed.

Mandatory confirmed in in-person SPCH001; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Would-take-again is about 25% and .

; in-person reviews largely warn against him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and grades span D- through A+ with little leniency described.

Format shift

Harsh tone is in-person; online review .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students cite so many papers, test-heavy load, discussions, and a presentation project.

Format shift

Both formats mention assignments; and tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Jokes and personality appear, but core complaints are weak instruction, absences, and unfair class design.

Format shift

Online student loved feedback and replies; in-person students felt abandoned or untaught.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of papers, quizzes, tests, discussions, and a .

Format shift

Online highlights discussions and presentation; and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person SPCH001 reviews are mostly negative: , and reports of no-shows.

Main concern

and unfair group-based scoring.

What students said

“Horrible instructor. He makes jokes to keep the class going. But honestly he should really put all that energy into actually teaching the class”
SPCH001
“He was so interested in getting the job as Dean of Communications that he never showed up to class.”
SPCH001
“it was a stupid way to base College it wasn't fair to the team”
SPCH001

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One strong online , and recommends him.

Main concern

Only one online review, so the positive signal may not generalize.

What students said

“Take him recommend!!!! !!”
SPCH01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and ; policies are not clearly student-friendly.

Team quiz exemption gameTest heavyQuizzes mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person mentions quizzes and a quiz.

Team quiz competitionTest heavyQuizzes
“whoever got the the quiz”
SPCH001
“Test heavy”
SPCH001

Online

Online comments focus on discussions and a .

DiscussionsProject presentation
“ !!”
SPCH01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to actually .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in person), highlighting teaching gaps and format split. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Horrible instructor. He makes jokes to keep the class going. But honestly he should really put all that energy into actually teaching the class”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“If you want to actually .”

⚖️ Fairness Concerns

28/100

“it was a stupid way to base College it wasn't fair to the team”

💻 Online Bright Spot

85/100

“Take him recommend!!!! !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes jokes to keep the class going
  • he should really put all that energy into actually teaching
  • Everything was jokes even his not helping his students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is a
  • So many papers
  • Test heavy

Theme 3

⚠️

  • it wasn't fair to the team
  • he never showed up to class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews across 2019-2025 with mixed formats and conflicting tone limit confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SPCH0013 reviews
SPCH011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values