AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Lindsey Jang

PHOTOYEP · PHOTO1587 · PHOTO26C · CINE26C · PHOTO26A · CINE026 · PHOTO126 · PHOTO6379 · CINEMA26A · 26A · PHOTOFALL · 26A71136 · CINE025 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
5.56%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Only for committed film majors who can tolerate long lectures and strict structure; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTime-wasting roll callTest-heavy film bootcampGroup projectsDisorganized lecturesPolarizing film mentor
  • Recent reviews slam wasted class time, favoritism, and weak movie-making instruction.
  • Older reviews often praise passion, humor, and serious film bootcamp training.
  • Expect , and heavy outside filming.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Serious film students say As are reachable by following guidelines, but and As.

All evidence is in person.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, and frequent hard quizzes make it demanding.

All evidence is in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Skip-class-you-wont-pass tags and .

All evidence is in person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Would-take-again is only about 6% and recent comments strongly discourage enrollment despite older praise.

All evidence is in person; older cohorts are far more positive than 2018+ reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and picky project rules appear often; creativity is constrained to his topics.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and long class blocks create a high time load.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Passion and industry knowledge are praised historically, but many recent students say structure and teaching value collapsed into chatter.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; tone shifted negative in later years.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Memorization quizzes, midterms, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All reviews are in person and highly polarized: recent cinema students report chaos and wasted hours, while many earlier film students call him a once-in-a-lifetime mentor.

Main concern

Long roll-call chatter, favoritism claims, and .

What students said

“I , and chips... not about how to make movies.”
CINE026
“Mr. Jang is one of those teachers that only comes along once in a lifetime.”
PHOTO26C
“This class was a ! What a waste! So disappointed”
CINEMA26A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and exams emphasize memorization and strict criteria more than open creative assessment.

Memorization quizzesFill-in-the-blankWord-for-word definitionsTest heavyMidterm and final

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessments are frequently test-heavy with memorization quizzes, midterms, and finals plus graded group films.

Memorization quizzesTest heavyMidterm required to passGroup film projects
“ and require word-for-word definitions.”
26A
“The ”
PHOTO26A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Terrible lectures and teacher that wastes time. I , and chips... not about how to make movies.”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 in-person reviews, contrasting recent complaints with older praise. Credibility rating: High.

⏰ Class Time Use

30/100

“He spends one hour taking roll. I wish this class was taught by someone else.”

🎬 Learning Outcomes

35/100

“Didn't learn much in this class. .”

❤️ Legacy Mentorship

90/100

“Mr. Jang is one of those teachers that only comes along once in a lifetime.”

📝 Assessment Style

35/100

“Did not learn how to make movies. Learned how to memorize for tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • wastes time on diversions and talking about nothing
  • He's hilarious

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A

Theme 3

🎥 About Film Bootcamp

  • intended for ACTUAL filmmakers
  • lots and lots of time needed for filming

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

, though older praise and newer criticism reduce consistency.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 511

Course coverage

PHOTO26A19 reviews
26A6 reviews
CINEMA26A4 reviews
PHOTO26C4 reviews
CINE0262 reviews
Show 8 more courses
CINE26C2 reviews
26A711361 review
CINE0251 review
PHOTO1261 review
PHOTO15871 review
PHOTO63791 review
PHOTOFALL1 review
PHOTOYEP1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1