AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Ben Warwas

ARCH10B · ARCH11 · ARCH10A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Skip him for ARCH studio unless , and low odds of an A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots of HomeworkLimits CreativityDisorganized StudioKnowledgeable but Unclear
  • Recent studio reviews warn of , and limited creative freedom.
  • Older lecture-style ARCH11 comments were more positive on attitude and feedback.
  • Students say he knows architecture but often fails to teach it clearly or fairly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

As and high grades appear, but , and nonstop studio work make an A costly and unreliable.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Architecture studio plus CAD and and production demands high.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and stress participation, though a few say it was not required.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recent students strongly advise against him for sanity and grading; older positive notes are outweighed by studio complaints.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; students say he grades by personal taste and does not believe in As.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Repeated lots of , and lecture-heavy demands never let up.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Knows architecture and can be funny, but , and poorly suited to teaching.

Format shift

; older ARCH11 comments are more positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Studio drawings, projects, essays, notebooks, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person studio and lecture comments split by era: older ARCH11 students liked his chill vibe, while recent ARCH10A/B students call him a and rejects student ideas.

Main concern

, and poor responsiveness can tank sanity and GPA.

What students said

“ .”
ARCH10A
“Lots of work to do constantly and it never ends.”
ARCH10B
“He is a very tough greater and doesn't believe in A's.”
ARCH10A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize continuous studio work and subjective .

Studio ProjectsHomework HeavySubjective Design Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, readings, and participation rather than described closed-book exams.

Studio ProjectsCAD WorkReading Notebooks
“You learn CAD and other important topics, but it is not an enjoyable class.”
ARCH10B
“A and notes on his lecture are required every fourth of the semester.”
ARCH11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews spanning studio and lecture courses. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Fit

36/100

“I don't think he is meant to be a Professor.”

📝 Workload Crush

22/100

“Gives BUNCH of hw. By far the .”

📉 Grade Reality

28/100

“He is a very tough greater and doesn't believe in A's.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • assumes that you should know things that he should teach
  • Not well organized and
  • Never taught me anything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of work to do constantly and it never ends.
  • only wants ideas he sees
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is knowledgeable at architecture.
  • Funny guy but doesn't seem to care too much about class.
  • Prof. Warwas has a great attitude and knows his stuff.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed in-person reviews span 2017-2025 with mixed eras; consistency is weaker because older lecture praise conflicts with recent studio criticism.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ARCH10B3 reviews
ARCH10A2 reviews
ARCH112 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1