AI Rate Professor

Biology

Membreno Salvador

BIO11 · BIO011 · BIO2571 · PYSO001 · PHYSIO1 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
38.46%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Only take him if , and accept a rough lecture experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough ExamsHeavy WorkloadHard to Follow LecturesGenerous CurveGroup Case Studies
  • Physiology with him is content-heavy, lecture-dense, and exam-driven.
  • Delivery issues (accent, handwriting, audio) repeatedly hurt comprehension.
  • Some students still pass via hard study, office hours, and a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

A curve and assignment credit help, but and dense content still demand heavy sustained study for high grades.

In-person evidence is primary; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Human , and case studies keep the course intellectually heavy.

Both formats describe high difficulty; online audio issues worsen learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Lecture attendance is repeatedly treated as .

; online sample is too small to show flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

and many warn others off despite pockets of support from self-directed hard workers.

Negative in-person warnings dominate; two online reviews also advise against.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Tough on exams yet several students note a and credit for full assignment effort.

Format shift

; .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and frequent exams create an overwhelming load.

Format shift

Heavy load appears in both formats.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some call him caring and interesting, but accent, handwriting, boredom, and .

Format shift

In-person is mixed; online focuses on poor recorded lecture quality.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams and quizzes drive outcomes, with labs and group cases as substantial secondary work.

Format shift

Online highlights long timed MC exams; in person adds labs and cases.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, group cases, and , though some praise care, curves, and office hours.

Main concern

, and lecture-exam mismatch frustrate many.

What students said

“ . His lecture are so long, his writing is horrible.”
PHYSIO1
“The though.”
PYSO001
“ ! and cares!”
PHYSIO1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Sparse online notes slam recorded lecture audio/handwriting and .

Main concern

Illegible recorded lectures plus long timed exams make remote learning especially rough.

What students said

“His recorded lectures are terrible. The sound quality is garbage”
PHYSIO1
“Exams:80 multiple choice questions in 90 min., 2 attempts not enough time to finish”
PHYSIO1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are tough, detailed, and ; online reports long timed MC tests with limited time.

Lecture-Based ExamsTimed Multiple ChoiceTwo Attempts OnlineHeavy ContentCurve Sometimes

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

- and slide-based, with averages often around C/D before curving.

Tough Lecture ExamsSlide BasedCurve Mentioned
“The .”
PYSO001
“ but it's .”
PYSO001

Online

Online exams described as 80 multiple-choice questions in 90 minutes with two attempts and strict time locks.

80 MC in 90 MinTwo AttemptsTime Lock
“Exams:80 multiple choice questions in 90 min., 2 attempts not enough time to finish, locks at set time & average kept.”
PHYSIO1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews (2 online, 17 in person), balancing delivery complaints with hard-work and . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Lecture Clarity

30/100

“His handwriting is entirely illegible.”

📚 Workload & Exams

24/100

“there's a lot of .”

💙 Care vs Delivery

45/100

“ and cares!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His recorded lectures are horrible.
  • Nice guy, horrible teacher.
  • he rattles off facts and often uses the WORD he is defining in the definition.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you study and work hard you should be fine.
  • so you'll get a decent grade
  • and sometimes his lectures are very hard to understand.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Mebreno is the best
  • he truly cares about his students.
  • I love his personality, he's very helpful when you ask him for questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews over many years give decent detail but mixed eras and only two online reviews limit format confidence.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

PHYSIO18 reviews
PYSO0018 reviews
BIO0111 review
BIO111 review
BIO25711 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2