AI Rate Professor

English

Sheri Gabrielsson

ENGL1A · ENG100 · ENGL8525 · ENGL100 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
35.29%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you write well already, can handle heavy peer work and a portfolio-weighted grade, and do not need strong in-class teaching.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderLots of HomeworkLecture HeavySo Many PapersPortfolio-Heavy
  • Recent students often call lectures slide-reading and unhelpful, with frequent redirects to the writing center.
  • and essay-heavy; the end-of-term portfolio can dominate the grade.
  • Older reviews are warmer, but and recent tone are clearly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Many As appear in grade data, but comments and heavy work, so an A still costs real effort.

Nearly all evidence is in person; the one online review still called the class a lot of work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard freshman English, but volume of , and .

In-person reviews dominate and and writing load.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and some tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

Attendance comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Would-take-again sits near 35% and many recent voices .

The sole online review recommends her; the bulk of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and nitpicky essay feedback appear repeatedly across ENGL1A and ENG100.

Format shift

; online sample is too small to contradict it.

Workload

Heavy

27/100

Students report lots of homework, peer reviews, discussions, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy English work; volume is clearest in in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Positives exist, but , and unhelpful answers drag overall teaching quality down.

Format shift

Online praise for comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and a heavily weighted portfolio rather than classic exams.

Format shift

and essay weight.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person feedback is mixed historically but recent comments stress , and limited teaching beyond slides.

Main concern

, and lectures that feel unhelpful despite mandatory attendance.

What students said

“ , and responds to everything with go to the writing center.”
ENGL1A
“What matters is the E-Portfolio that she gives you at the end of the semester worth 70% of your grade.”
ENGL1A
“ and overall not a enjoyable class”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single online review praises her as caring and flexible with , while still noting heavy English workload.

Main concern

Only one online review, so online experience is weakly evidenced.

What students said

“Professor Gabrielsson was one of the most caring and thoughtful professors I've had.”
ENGL1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely detail traditional exams and instead emphasize essays, portfolio, and occasional presentations.

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on papers and a large portfolio; load.

Essay heavyPortfolio weightedPeer reviewsOccasional presentation
“the portfolio at the end of the semester is worth 70% of your grade so keep that in mind”
ENGL1A
“All the hmw including the 3 take home essays are done online and ”
ENGL100

Online

single online review.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want a teacher who gets paid to not teach Sheri is the person for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews spanning 2012-2025, with and teaching themes. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ and doesn't teach.”

📝 Heavy Writing Load

27/100

“She assigned lots of , and .”

⚖️

28/100

“she is a and nit picky.”

👎 Recommendation

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are long and boring and by the end you won't learn anything new.
  • She often just tells you to go to the writing center and was unhelpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • SHE DOESN'T CARE HOW HARD YOU STUDY.
  • All the work throughout the semester doesn't matter. What matters is the E-Portfolio
  • Do not think that this class is an easy A though, you definitely need to work

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • , but passive aggressive on bad days.
  • kinda passive aggressive and overall not a enjoyable class
  • She wants all of her students to pass and will help you if you are struggling.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

28 reviews span many years with and heavy writing, though tone improved historically and worsened recently.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 59
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENGL1A16 reviews
ENG10010 reviews
ENGL1001 review
ENGL85251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 2