AI Rate Professor

English

Renee Grodsky

ENG001A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her only if you write on time, welcome critical topics, and ; if you need late-work flexibility or an easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderNo Late WorkDetailed Essay FeedbackPolarizing TopicsPaper Heavy
  • use it.
  • Strict no-late-work policy and .
  • Reviews split on whether topical progressive material inspires growth or feels ideological.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

, and tough standards make an A difficult and .

Online review is more optimistic; impossible.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is college English with critical reading and but still demanding.

Online student called effort required but not hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

36/100

and participation matters.

Almost all evidence is in person; the one .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

and feedback; others warn and tone.

The single online review is strongly positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and essay-centered scoring leave little room for recovery.

Format shift

online review.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Multiple papers and readings create steady work, though not always described as overwhelming.

Format shift

; online still requires essay effort.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Praised for feedback and passion, criticized for bias, eye-rolling, and limited outside access.

Format shift

Online review is strongly positive; in-person experience is more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Essays and written work dominate the .

Format shift

True across formats based on available comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

writing and tough, inflexible grader with ideology concerns.

Main concern

, and perceived bias or dismissiveness in class.

What students said

“Impossible to get an A in the class. Most of the grade .”
ENG001A
“She's tough on her no-late work policy.”
ENG001A
“A great teacher who I firmly believe helped me become a better writer.”
ENG001A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online student praised , and real writing growth with manageable effort.

Main concern

Still requires consistent effort; single review limits certainty.

What students said

“She will give full feedback for and if you actually use them you can't fail.”
ENG001A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay-driven with strict deadlines rather than proctored exams.

Essay-based gradingNo late workDetailed feedbackMultiple papers

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and small assignments with no late work and tough scoring.

Essay-heavyNo late workEqual-weight small assignments
“A 5 minute paragraph and a 3 page essay (you've spent a month working on) are held at the same value.”
ENG001A
“ and ”
ENG001A

Online

and effort-based success without classic exam risk.

Detailed essay feedbackModern progressive topics
“She will give full feedback for and if you actually use them you can't fail.”
ENG001A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A great teacher who I firmly believe helped me become a better writer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (1 online, 6 in , and polarization. Credibility rating: Medium.

✍️

75/100

“ .”

🚫 No Late Work

30/100

“She's tough on her no-late work policy.”

⚖️ Polarizing Classroom

40/100

“I think this teacher pushes her ideology onto the students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her material is very topical and designed to challenge students
  • She is really passionate and made class fun and enjoyable

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Impossible to get an A in the class.
  • Most of the grade .
  • All her assailments are due on the dot.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Incredibly kind! and funny
  • is super fake towards students.
  • Rollers her eyes a lot when no one participates.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 7 reviews with one online, but comments are detailed and , and polarized tone.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG001A7 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 3