AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Melissa Michelson

132ESL · ESL · ESL33A · ESL33B · ESL122 · ESL420 · ESL0307 · ESL113 · ESL422 · ENG0006 · ESL420460 · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative and are ready for , and self-directed ESL study.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderMood-based gradingDisorganized lecturesTest heavyHigh drop risk
  • Large majority of 50 reviews rate quality at 1/5 and warn others not to enroll.
  • Students report , and grades based on mood rather than standards.
  • A minority of older or recent online voices are positive, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Comments , and frequent C/D/Incomplete or drop outcomes.

; a few recent online reviews are more positive but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students call the class hard due , and unpredictable expectations rather than pure content joy.

Difficulty complaints are strongest in in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass, with .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Would-take-again is about 17% and the dominant student message is do not enroll.

Recent online support exists but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

, and many low or incomplete outcomes dominate.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework, test-heavy structure, weekly pressure, and .

Format shift

Heavy workload is mainly documented in in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most students say , and wastes time.

Format shift

A few online students call her excellent, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tests, quizzes, and a few high-stakes essays drive grades more than low-stakes practice.

Format shift

Test-heavy and essay-heavy complaints appear mainly in person; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative about disorganization, , and unhelpful office hours.

Main concern

Many students report low pass rates, mood-based grades, and little learning despite heavy work.

What students said

“She is the worse professor that I have ever had. Save your GPA and .”
ESL122
“ GPA with her catastrophic grades.”
ESL33A
“She doesn't understand the book, the .”
ESL420
“75% of your grade , and the grades are NOT depends on your grammar and writing skills but HER MOOD.”
ESL122

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

two recent 5/5 students praise focus and progress, while older online and .

Main concern

and avoid warnings appear alongside a few strong supporters.

What students said

“She is excellent professor; I had taken two classes this semester and .”
132ESL
“Don't wasting time. !”
ESL422
“so hard pass the test”
ESL420

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and essays are described as hard, sometimes poorly aligned to lessons, with little student-friendly policy detail.

Test heavyPop quizzesHard timed testsEssay-heavy grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

time limits, and essay grades that feel arbitrary.

Hard testsPop quizzesMood-based essay gradesShort test time
“Instead of giving a text and didn't give enough time to finished.”
ESL33A
“The .”
ESL122
“Her teaching is .”
ESL33A

Online

Online evidence is thin but and mixed overall course quality.

Hard tests
“so hard pass the test”
ESL420

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save your GPA and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews with a and a smaller positive minority. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She doesn't understand the book, the . and she can't give the lesson.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

16/100

“ , and it's true that her grade is based on her mood. Save your GPA!!”

⚖️

14/100

“the grades are NOT depends on your grammar and writing skills but HER MOOD”

📉 Pass Risk

20/100

“We were 20 students in the class and at the end we were only 8 which only 3 passed”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • doesn't know how to instruct step by step

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • so hard pass the test
  • ruined my GPA with her catastrophic grades
  • only 4 people pass

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support & Access

  • We went to her office hours and she's not there
  • she didn't want to answer or
  • her response will always be come to my office hour

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years show a long, consistent majority-negative pattern with detailed complaints and only a smaller positive minority.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 534

Course coverage

ESL12214 reviews
ESL33A12 reviews
ESL33B5 reviews
ESL4 reviews
ESL4224 reviews
Show 8 more courses
1222 reviews
132ESL2 reviews
ESL4202 reviews
63371 review
ENG00061 review
ESL03071 review
ESL1131 review
ESL4204601 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

5

C 2 · C- 3

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1