AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Natasha Bajc

ARCH12A · ARCH011 · 12B · ARCH13 · ARCH12B · ARCH012B · 12A · ARCH024A · ARCH024B · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
21.74%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Skip her if you want real architecture instruction; if and still want a soft A.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-taught via YouTubeDisorganized CanvasEasy A if you coastRambles off topicLate and ungraded
  • Most students say she is nice and knowledgeable but a weak teacher who assigns YouTube and expects self-learning.
  • Grades are often easy As if you submit work, yet rubrics, grade posting, and .
  • Online and , and rambling lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many students who turned work in report an A with .

Both online and in-person students report soft As if work is submitted; grade transparency is worse online.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Intellectual bar is low because content is often videos and , though software self-teaching can confuse beginners.

In person ; online is mostly watching and posting.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

Several comments say half the class skipped all semester and still passed; .

; online has no real live attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Low would-take-again and if you want to learn.

Negative tone is strong in both formats, with only a few older defenders.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students often get As for presence and effort, but criteria feel subjective and grades may not post for weeks.

Format shift

Online students especially report missing grade posts; in person is soft but engagement-based.

Workload

Light

70/100

, and scattered projects; a few sections mention more homework.

Format shift

Online workload is minimal modules; .

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Knowledgeable but , and reliant on students teaching themselves from YouTube.

Format shift

; online focuses on recycled third-party videos.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and few assignments rather than structured exams.

Format shift

; assignment and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and software learning pushed to YouTube while grades stay soft if you do the work.

Main concern

Little real teaching of core software and portfolio skills despite easy grades.

What students said

“be prepared to have her yap for hoursss abt random stuff like philosophy rather than teach.”
ARCH12B
“Expects you to learn from .”
ARCH12A
“ ”
12B

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections recycle outdated videos and and ignored emails.

Main concern

Almost no original instruction and .

What students said

“Expect outdated documentaries (2000s), decade-old YouTube, other professor's zoom lectures, and no content from the actual professor.”
ARCH011
“Lectures were just YouTube videos, some not credible, and e-book readings. No grades were posted even after the semester ended.”
70398

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely describe formal exams; assessment is mainly projects and vague criteria with delayed grades.

Few clear examsProject basedUnclear rubricsGrades posted late

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Some mention midterms or finals but and .

Project basedLate gradingSubjective A or B
“she has no clear grading rubric at all, it's either a B or an A depending on how engaging you are to the class.”
ARCH024A
“the semester ended a week ago and i still don't know my grade bc she doesn't grade anything.”
12A

Online

; students stress missing submission buttons, unclear assignments, and grades never posted.

Unclear assignmentsNo grades postedYouTube as lecture
“Prepare to stress about minimal instructions, assignments without a submission button, no info on grades, and ignored emails.”
ARCH011
“No grades were posted even after the semester ended.”
70398

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are serious about architecture.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews with strong consistency on poor teaching quality versus easy grades. Credibility rating: High.

📺 Self-Teaching Required

26/100

“You'll mostly learn from YouTube videos but you'll get the gist of what the class was supposed to teach you by the end of it.”

🅰️ Soft Grades

82/100

“Just put in the work and you will get a good grade. I did what she would asks and got an A.”

🚫

24/100

“ ”

🗣️ Rambling Lectures

30/100

“all she did was lecture. Just talked the entire time, a lot of the time talking about random stuff.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she's nice but nobody knows what she's talking abt 24/7
  • Her lectures are random and for most of the class she is looking up how to do whatever she is trying to teach.
  • Natashas heart is not in teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do as told = gets an A.
  • she is not a .
  • don't risk a 4.0 taking her!!

Theme 3

🗂️ About Organization

  • the and unorganized
  • reused old content with old due dates
  • No syllabus given.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

23 reviews over many years with consistent themes of disorganization, self-teaching, and soft grades despite quality score of 2.0.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 515

Course coverage

12A5 reviews
ARCH12A4 reviews
ARCH12B3 reviews
ARCH133 reviews
703982 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ARCH024A2 reviews
12B1 review
ARCH0111 review
ARCH012B1 review
ARCH024B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

12

A 12

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1