AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Mari Pritchard-Parker

ANTH001 · ARCH1 · ANTH002 · ANTH003 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
64.29%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Solid easy anthropology option if you attend, follow formatting rules, and study her notes; pick someone else if you need rigorous bio anthro teaching.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyDocumentary heavySweet and caringStrict paper marginsEasy if you tryNotes from lectures
  • Many students call her sweet and say tests come straight from her notes or .
  • Critics hate mandatory videos for , and weak biological anthro content.
  • ; grades may not post until the end.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many students get As by studying her notes and doing simple essays, though a and .

The single online review was effortless A+; in person is easy for most but .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Material is mostly videos and lecture , so content challenge is low for a GE course.

Online is watch-and-note; in person is .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and penalties for missing class materials.

In person is usually mandatory; the online section was asynchronous with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

Majority praise her kindness and easy structure, while a .

In-person opinions split; the one online review is strongly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Tests are straightforward from notes, but and formatting with .

Format shift

Online felt generous; in person is fair overall with picky paper rules.

Workload

Light

74/100

Mainly videos, short notes, a couple exams, and a .

Format shift

Online workload was weekly videos and occasional papers; in person similar with more class time.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Warm, passionate, and , but others find lectures scattered and bio content thin.

Format shift

In-person character praise is strong; online was passive video learning.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

A few midterms or quizzes plus essays and a .

Format shift

In ; online leaned video notes and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

few exams, and short essays with caring but sometimes scattered teaching.

Main concern

Strict margins, late grade posting, and uneven content depth especially in biological anthropology.

What students said

“Her class is literally an easy A”
ANTH003
“She has ridiculous rules about one and a half inch margins”
ANTH003
“we just watched videos every week & got a paragraph or so of notes.”
ANTH001

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One async online student found weekly long videos and +.

Main concern

Very thin sample, so online quality is uncertain.

What students said

“It was effortless, I just had to watch a 1-2 hour video every week and write notes on it.”
ANTH001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams track her notes and videos rather than surprise material, with essays as a major second component.

Tests from lecture notesMultiple choice and T/FDocumentary note quizzesResearch paper

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

A couple midterms and a with strict formatting.

Notes-based testsMultiple choiceStrict essay marginsFew major exams
“ notes)”
ANTH003
“ ”
ANTH001

Online

; assessment was weekly video notes and easy papers.

Weekly video notesShort papersNo proctoring mentioned
“watch a 1-2 hour video every week and write notes on it. And but it was easy too”
ANTH001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“IDK abt the bad reviews but she's literally the . Her class is literally an easy A”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, balancing recent easy-A praise with critiques of formatting and content depth. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Caring Professor

66/100

“Sweetest lady i've ever had as a professor.”

🅰️ Easy A Path

76/100

“Easy A if you put in the bare minimum.”

📐 Formatting Strictness

45/100

“She has ridiculous rules about one and a half inch margins that she will penalize you for if not followed exactly.”

🎥 Video Heavy Class

60/100

“We just watched a bunch of documentaries (they were all interesting and well done) and were tested off her notes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is passionate about archeology
  • She makes the class interesting and easy to follow.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she doesn't grade till the very end of class but it's not hard to get an A
  • .
  • follow her guidelines for written assignments and you'll get an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she's literally the sweetest, most understanding professor EVER
  • and understanding
  • lovely lady. talks about her family often.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

16 reviews with and only one online review; enough detail for trends but not fully settled.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ANTH0018 reviews
ANTH0036 reviews
ANTH0021 review
ARCH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values