AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Gabrielle Kohpahl

ANTHRO001 · BIO11 · ANTHRO2 · ANTHR30 · ANTH1 · ANTHRO1 · ANTH001 · B11 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid if and fair transparent grades; only self-directed students might survive.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes not teachYouTube-heavy classLate grade entryDisorganized examsUnresponsive emails
  • Most students say she barely teaches and fills class with YouTube videos or off-topic talk.
  • Grades often appear only near finals week, with unfair or .
  • A few students find her caring or easy online, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Several students say tests are , and , so an A is not straightforward.

The one online review implies an easy A+; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content itself is not always described as advanced, but poor teaching and busy work make the experience harder than the material.

In-person comments dominate; online alone is too thin to redefine course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and mention presentations meant to force show-up.

; the single online review does not clarify attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

About one in , and most recent detailed reviews .

; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Students describe unfair drops after seeing submissions, messy grade entry, and tough mismatched exams.

Format shift

Harsh grading complaints .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Many report lots of homework, presentations, busy work, and .

Format shift

In-person workload complaints dominate; online is described as simple.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant themes are no teaching, YouTube days, rambling, language barriers, and being unprepared.

Format shift

One online positive outlier contrasts with strongly negative in-person teaching reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

and and busy work also counting, more than steady low-stakes mastery.

Format shift

; online assessment detail is minimal.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe no real teaching, busy work, , and disorganization.

Main concern

Students report impossible or , and little useful instruction.

What students said

“HORRIBLE. She made us do SO MANY in class presentations to get us to show up to learn nothing.”
ANTH001
“Literally didn't teach. ... Everything on the .”
ANTHRO1
“She just puts youtube videos on all day. That is the whole class.”
ANTHRO2

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The single online review calls the class simple and strongly recommends her.

Main concern

Only one online review, so the positive online snapshot is not reliable alone.

What students said

“Simple straightforward class! !!!”
ANTH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

reviews, and paired with late or unfair grading.

Hard examsStudy guides mismatchedLate grade postingHeavy tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

sessions, and study guides that do not match exams.

Hard examsMismatched study guidesLate grading of exams
“ do with exams.”
ANTHRO1
“ ! And you cannot get anything useful for her review class.”
ANTH001
“Everything on the . They're impossible and so frustrating.”
ANTHRO1

Online

The single online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (1 online, 14 in person), emphasizing teaching absence and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“SHE IS HORRIBLE. if you're looking to learn something. She never taught one thing.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“ .”

⚖️

25/100

“ so unfair. Its almost like she sees what students submit, and .”

📺 Classroom Reality

20/100

“She just puts youtube videos on all day. That is the whole class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Literally didn't teach. Tries to lecture, then asks why everyone is staring at her.
  • Youtube videos all day.
  • She gets distracted very easily & rambles a lot.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she doesn't enter grades until the last week of class.
  • passing her class is not easy ... she is not direct on .
  • if you want to get a A !

Theme 3

💬 About Character & Contact

  • .
  • I LOVE HER she was a .
  • Prof. Kohpahl is very sweet and that's it!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews with consistent negative themes are useful, but sparse online evidence and older mixed positives keep credibility below high.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ANTH0014 reviews
ANTHRO24 reviews
ANTHRO12 reviews
ANTH11 review
ANTHR301 review
Show 3 more courses
ANTHRO0011 review
B111 review
BIO111 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

4

B 2 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2