AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Ali Amouzegar

ENGR16 · ENGR016 · ENGR12 · LL70203 · ENGR1 · ELTY248D · ENGR010 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take him for hands-on or intro engineering if you will attend office hours, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHands-On ProjectsCaring but UnevenAccent Can ChallengeGroup Work FocusChill When Engaged
  • Many students call him caring, funny, and and electricity courses.
  • some love hands-on classes while others report or slow coverage.
  • One online dynamics review is extremely negative; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Many A and A+ grades appear with , and participation, but and subject difficulty still require real work.

Online dynamics student still got an A despite hating the class; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Subject matter like circuits and dynamics is inherently tough; some sections feel chill while others lag or overwhelm.

Online dynamics felt hardest; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while as optional.

; online review said not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and projects; a vocal minority and the online dynamics review would not.

; the lone online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Exams and , but quizzes are often described as strict.

Format shift

; online review did not detail grading style beyond heavy assignments.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, and final are common without extreme homework volume.

Format shift

Online dynamics felt assignment-only and incomplete; and group work.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Caring and sometimes excellent, yet several reviews cite unclear lectures, no teaching online, or wasted time.

Format shift

In-person teaching is average-to-good; online dynamics evidence is awful.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and final depending on the engineering course.

Format shift

and exams; and tests only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

tougher circuit analysis; he is often seen as caring and willing to help, with mixed lecture clarity.

Main concern

Accent, slow or convoluted lectures, and .

What students said

“Prof is a bit old school but . If you show you want to be there and learn, he will do everything he can to help”
ENGR010
“Nice guy but ineffective teaching. 3 hours straight of Zoom lecture, often with no breaks.”
ENGR016

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online dynamics review reports no real lectures, YouTube fillers, incomplete topics, and a .

Main concern

No substantive teaching and incomplete coverage in online dynamics.

What students said

“ and stay clear for dynamics. This is the and anywhere else. The professor provided ”
ENGR12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Typical engineering mix of quizzes, projects, midterm, and .

Midterm and FinalGroup QuizzesProjects Generously GradedTough Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

if you know procedures; while projects are graded generously.

Midterm and FinalGroup QuizzesGenerous Project Grades
“ and if you know the procedures)”
ENGR016
“He's a but ”
ENGR010

Online

Online review mentions homework, quiz problems, midterm, and final but .

HomeworkQuizzesMidtermFinal
“ , and final”
ENGR12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof is a bit old school but . If you show you want to be there and learn, he will do everything he can to help (go to office hours).”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews across engineering courses, separating strong online . Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Support

75/100

“He is a wonderful teacher. He is a funny person, and he cares about his students.”

🎯 Teaching Consistency

60/100

“Nice guy but ineffective teaching. 3 hours straight of Zoom lecture, often with no breaks.”

🛠️ Hands-On Classes

80/100

“Superduper chill. The course was hands-on with not a ton of reading and writing compared to normal courses.”

🚫 Online Dynamics Warning

20/100

“ and stay clear for dynamics. This is the and anywhere else.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Amouzegar is a phenominal teacher! So
  • he's also a troll and has really convoluted lectures
  • He knows almost everything about science and engineering

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ENGR 1 is an easy A class, as long as you show up
  • He's a but
  • He grades easy and

Theme 3

🧰 About Course Format

  • The professor provided , occasionally looked up YouTube videos
  • slight accent makes it a little hard to understand at times

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

12 reviews across multiple engineering courses and years provide solid coverage, though formats and course difficulty differ widely.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ELTY248D3 reviews
ENGR0163 reviews
ENGR0102 reviews
ENGR11 review
ENGR121 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGR161 review
LL702031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 6

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1