AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hai Ong

MATH09 · MATHEMATIC · MATH9 · ALGEB134 · MATH6450 · MATH003 · MATH009 · MATH131 · MATH402 · MATH125 · MATH005A · MATH03 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
56.25%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if , and treat the few exams as the whole grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyEXTRA CREDIT homeworkFast lecturesExam reviewsPolarizing
  • Grades usually rest on a .
  • , so prepared self-starters can score well.
  • Many struggle with pace, accent, and perceived lack of care, creating sharp split reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

as and exams mirror reviews or HW, so an A is realistic if you prepare for tests.

Online reviews especially call it an easy A; in person agrees for self-starters but not for students needing more support.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

Material itself is manageable for many, but rapid lectures and multi-section days raise the challenge.

Online GE math feels lighter; in-person calc and intermediate courses feel faster and harder for weaker students.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Often marked mandatory or skip-and-fail, especially around review days, though .

Online reviews stress roll call and not skipping; in person is mixed but review day is critical.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

great for independent test-focused students, poor fit for .

; recent in-person Calc 1 comments are more polarized and often harsh.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Exams mirror reviews and HW helps, but and some call him a tough grader.

Format shift

; in person reports both generous EC and tough outcomes.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework can be lengthy but is often only ; real pressure .

Format shift

Both formats are test-centered; online frequently makes HW optional.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

, and helpful while many find pace too fast, accent hard, and .

Format shift

; in-person quality is highly split.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Most sections grade almost only on three exams and a as .

Format shift

Online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some praise chill A potential and to understand, or uncaring.

Main concern

Fast lectures plus exam-only pressure and .

What students said

“You do hw = . .”
Math005A
“ if you want a good time at college.”
Math005A
“Your grade consists of three tests and one final, with .”
MATH03

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online MATH003 reviews are mostly positive: , and easy A if you attend and study.

Main concern

Grade .

What students said

“Easy A if you do the work.”
MATH003
“He literally reviews whats going to be on the test.”
MATH003

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests closely follow review and , so they are predictable but high-stakes.

Exam review dayTests like homeworkFew exams plus finalHomework as extra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, three tests and a ; review day problems often match the .

Three tests plus finalReview day matches examHW due on test day as EC
“Grades and a . and is due on the day of the exam.”
Math005A
“He always reviews the class before the test and what he reviews is almost identical to the questions on the test.”
MATH125

Online

Online students report several exams including a final, strong reviews, and .

Test heavyTest reviewAssignment optional
“Had 4 exams including final. . ”
MATH003
“ . You have 3 test and .”
MATH003

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You do hw = . . PLUS he does a Exam review.”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 , and polarized teaching quality. Credibility rating: High.

📊 Teaching Quality Split

52/100

“ , and a terrible Professor.”

🎯 Easy A Path

76/100

“Easy A if you do the work.”

⚡ Pace Concern

40/100

“this guy teaches insanely fast. he covers 3 or more sections in 1 class meeting within an hour.”

📝

70/100

“what he reviews is almost identical to the questions on the test.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Boring lec doesn't answer q's good.
  • Prof. Ong made every lesson easy to grasp
  • He does teach fast.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • HW are and .
  • Your grade consists of three tests and
  • anyone can pass with A as long as u put in the work

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Support

  • Doesn't care whether you are doing well or not.
  • He wants to help students pass.
  • if you want a good time at college.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

49 reviews over many years and courses show stable structural patterns despite polarized opinions on teaching quality.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 58
3 out of 53
2 out of 59
1 out of 510

Course coverage

Math005A14 reviews
MATH12511 reviews
MATH1318 reviews
MATH0036 reviews
MATH032 reviews
Show 8 more courses
1311 review
ALGEB1341 review
MATH0091 review
MATH091 review
MATH4021 review
MATH64501 review
MATH91 review
MATHEMATIC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 6 · A 8

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2