AI Rate Professor

English

David Ascencio

001A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Only take him if you value a and ; evidence is too thin to treat as a sure thing.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyMixed reviewsOff-topic lecturesCaring for returnersUnclear criteriaHilarious
  • Only two reviews and they sharply disagree on teaching quality.
  • One student felt lectures wandered and .
  • Another returning student found him caring, funny, and confidence-building.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

One student earned an A+ with while another got a B with moderate difficulty, so an A seems reachable but not automatic.

All evidence is from two in person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Difficulty ratings stay low to moderate, but harder than the content is.

All evidence is from in person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as .

All evidence is from in person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and one non-answer plus quality split leave recommendation highly conditional.

All evidence is from in person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and an A+ appear, but the other student still landed a B with .

Format shift

All evidence is from in person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

No overwhelming workload claims, but and standard English coursework keep it moderate.

Format shift

All evidence is from in person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students split between hilarious caring support and irrelevant lecture time with .

Format shift

All evidence is from in person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments , and rather than major exams.

Format shift

All evidence is from in person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person English 001A reviews split between caring confidence boost and .

Main concern

Assignment criteria and lecture focus may feel muddled for some students.

What students said

“He yaps about irrelevant stuff more than half the class time.”
001A
“ if you are looking for a teacher that cares about what he teaches and his students.”
001A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe formal exams; and feedback.

Assignment focusedExtra creditFeedback heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person comments , and rather than proven exam proctoring policies.

Assignment criteriaExtra creditFeedback
“When it comes to assignments, he's not very clear on the criteria nor the appropriate terms for completing the assignments.”
001A
“he renewed my confidence after not taking classes for many years”
001A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are looking for a teacher that cares about what he teaches and his students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the support-versus-clarity split. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He yaps about irrelevant stuff more than half the class time.”

❤️ Student Support

80/100

“he renewed my confidence after not taking classes for many years”

📋 Clarity of Expectations

30/100

“he's not very clear on the criteria nor the appropriate terms for completing the assignments”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He yaps about irrelevant stuff more than half the class time
  • by the last hour of lecture, he's rushing through what the
  • He's a great teacher

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • cares about what he teaches and his students
  • Hilarious

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 reviews with opposite tones provide thin, conflicting evidence and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

001A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values