AI Rate Professor

English

Daniel Staylor

ENG001 · ART001C · ART004A · ART4B · 001A · ART004C · ART001B · ART001A · 110 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
85.59%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him for art history if you will do the readings and writing; and engagement.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and flexibleHeavy reading and writingPractice exams match testsClear expectationsSlow grading at times
  • Caring, chill art-history professor who wants students to pass and .
  • , and essays with grace periods for late work.
  • , while in-person lectures and museum trips are strongly praised.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most students earn As , and showing up; and flexible rather than free.

Both formats report easy As if work is done; online adds more writing posts and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, but volume of reading and writing keeps it from being effortless.

In person emphasizes lectures and discussion; online emphasizes modules, journals, and discussion posts.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while most online sections treat attendance as optional.

; in-person reviews frequently say yes or that showing up helps.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Strong majority would take him again for , and fair paths to good grades.

Recommendation is high in both formats, with stronger lecture praise in person and more organization caveats online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Grace periods, late-work flexibility, and fair criteria make grades attainable if work is completed.

Format shift

Online students more often note delayed grades; in-person students stress flexibility and .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Expect , and essays rather than a light quiz-only load.

Format shift

Online often feels writing-heavy; in , and museum work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students describe him as , and helpful, with weaker marks mainly for online organization and .

Format shift

In-person teaching is widely loved; a minority of online reviews call the course disorganized.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Grade mix includes readings, writing posts, quizzes, essays, midterms, and .

Format shift

Online leans toward discussions and journals; in person adds practice exams and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person is chill and engaging with , and flexible grace periods if you show up and participate.

Main concern

Lots of assigned reading and .

What students said

“By far the most chill professor I've taken. A lot of assigned articles but they're easy to read, plus as long as you show up for lecture + participate you're pretty much set.”
ART001C
“For are exactly how the test is going to be so there are no surprises”
ART001C
“ !!!”
art004A

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online is doable with weekly writing posts, journals, and quizzes, but and heavy writing.

Main concern

Disorganization and late in the term.

What students said

“gave about two writing posts per week, very easy and doable. However, this class requires a minimum amount of effort.”
ART001A
“It's the end of the semester and he has not graded a single thing besides 2 quizzes.”
ART001A
“A LOT of class discussions and journals so lots of writing but relatively easy if you do the readings.”
ART001A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes that mirror real questions; reviews do not clearly prove strict proctoring.

Practice exams match testsQuizzes with multiple attemptsEssay-based examsClear study guides

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and are previewed by practice exams that match the real format.

Practice exams match real testsEssay examsStudy guides
“For are exactly how the test is going to be so there are no surprises”
ART001C
“Exams require writing essays, but on the test.”
ART001C

Online

Online quizzes and exams are described as fairly easy if you complete modules and quizzes; .

Module quizzesMultiple quiz attemptsMidterm and final
“The and helped for the and you have multiple attempts.”
ART001A
“Two mandatory museum visits that , and a midterm and final.”
ART001A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and online vs in-person differences. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Flexibility

88/100

“He is very flexible and has a grace period which is nice for those who have busy schedules.”

📚 Reading and Writing Load

52/100

“A LOT of class discussions and journals so lots of writing but relatively easy if you do the readings.”

📝

78/100

“For are exactly how the test is going to be so there are no surprises”

👍 Strong Recommendation

88/100

“This is one of the and I took 60 credits and can say that.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Easy-going professor, as long as you're communicative.
  • He is extremely informative and makes lectures fun.
  • Dan is an

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • as long as you show up for lecture + participate you're pretty much set
  • Not a difficult course at all if you stay on top of deadlines.
  • As long as your read the material and compete the

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Organization

  • I'm sure he's better in person but .
  • I took Professor Staylor's online class and regretted it; I should have taken the class in person.
  • He may be better in person, but online has been frustrating.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

110

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent detailed reviews across online and and flexibility with recurring notes on reading load and occasional online lag.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 584
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ART001A22 reviews
ART001C9 reviews
ART4B8 reviews
001A3 reviews
art004A2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ART004C2 reviews
ENG0012 reviews
ART001B1 review
ART004A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

27

A+ 8 · A 17 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 2 · B- 4

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Not sure yet 7