AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Suzanne Anderson

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Consider her political theory class only if and rigorous writing, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHigh standardsDiscussion heavyTough graderSo many papersLoves the subject
  • Only two reviews, and they strongly disagree.
  • One student loves insightful discussions and if you do the reading.
  • Another criticizes perfect-paper expectations, unclear instructions, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and a B with perfection demands show an A requires high effort and precise work.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

, and many papers make political theory intellectually demanding.

In-person evidence only from two students.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory and participation matters.

In-person only.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One strong yes for insightful teaching; one student will not take .

Split 50/50 from two in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Labeled a and holds students to perfection.

Format shift

In-person only; negative review stresses no credit for trying.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reading plus many papers and high-standard writing create a heavy course load.

Format shift

and required reading.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Insightful discussions and passion for the subject conflict with and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on papers, reading, and discussion rather than classic exams.

Format shift

and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and paper-heavy expectations.

Main concern

and strict perfectionism for some students.

What students said

“she is extremely insightful and holds many in class discussions on current events and lessons”
32582
“This professor doesn't even give you credit for trying, she wants everything done perfectly but unless you ask her.”
32582

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a ; assessment appears paper and discussion driven.

Paper-focused assessmentDiscussion-based classNo exam format detailed

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students emphasize papers and discussions.

So many papersIn-class discussions
“Make sure to do the reading and it's so !!”
32582
“So many papers”
32582

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She holds her students to a high standard but is always there to help, and you can tell she loves her work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the sharp split between praise and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Insight

75/100

“she is extremely insightful and holds many in class discussions on current events and ”

📝

28/100

“This professor doesn't even give you credit for trying, she wants everything done perfectly but unless you ask her.”

👍 Split Recommendation

50/100

“I won't be taking this class again.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • extremely insightful
  • holds many in class discussions
  • you can tell she loves her work

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • wants everything done perfectly
  • So many papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting in-person reviews from 2024 provide too little consistent evidence for strong conclusions.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

325822 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1