AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ferdous Ahmed

VALORANT · RACISM67 · FORTNITE101 · MATH5B · GENDERSTUDIES · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

, failing grades, and hostile student tone.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderLots of homeworkAvoid himPolitical lecturesUnclear spam reviews
  • Most reviews rate quality near the bottom and report failing grades.
  • The few serious , and political pressure.
  • Many course names and comments look like jokes, so trust the overall pattern more than any single quote.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Reported grades cluster at F and D-minus with and .

All evidence is in-person.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

Difficulty ratings are very high and comments call exams too hard with heavy work.

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

while others say it is not.

All evidence is in-person and inconsistent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most quality scores are 1s and the clearest serious .

All evidence is in-person; several joke reviews reduce clarity.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and most reported grades are F or D-minus.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Tags and comments repeatedly mention lots of , and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Students overwhelmingly rate teaching poorly and say he does not help.

Format shift

In-person only; joke reviews add noise but do not improve the average.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy tags and comments about hard exams dominate what little serious assessment detail exists.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All nine reviews are in person and mostly highly negative, with several joke-like posts mixed among harsh math warnings.

Main concern

, and low teaching satisfaction.

What students said

“ ! ! He tries to force his political views on students.”
math5b
“breda not help. exem too hard”
genderstudies
“this professor makes me want to stop breathing”
genderstudies

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as too hard with little helpful support.

Test heavyHard examsTough grader

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments call exams too hard and the .

Hard examsTest heavyNo clear help
“breda not help. exem too hard”
genderstudies
“ ! ! He tries to force his political views on students.”
math5b

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! ! He tries to force his political views on students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, discounting joke spam while preserving the dominant negative pattern. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

22/100

“ ! ! He tries to force his political views on students.”

📉 Teaching Quality

16/100

“breda not help. exem too hard”

⚖️ Harsh Outcomes

15/100

“this professor makes me want to stop breathing”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • exem too hard
  • ! !

Theme 2

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • He tries to force his political views on students.
  • breda not help.
  • this professor makes me want to stop breathing

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews exist, but many are joke-like with nonsense course names, so confidence stays low despite consistently poor scores.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

genderstudies4 reviews
math5b2 reviews
fortnite1011 review
racism671 review
Valorant1 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D- 2

F

5

F 5

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1