AI Rate Professor

Legal Administration

Talar Guedikian

LEGAL146 · PLGL146 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her if you want practical paralegal training and will put in precise effort; avoid if and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and accessiblePractical paralegal workOnline savvyClear grading criteriaOccasional tough grader
  • , and strong at real paralegal skills with no textbook often.
  • , and available.
  • A minority report rude early-term experiences, unclear instructions, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many earn A/A- with effort and , but and one F after full effort show an A is not free.

Online reviews skew more positive on success; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Material is practical paralegal skill work that needs precision, not a brain-burner theory course.

Both formats report moderate challenge; online tags still include high difficulty for some.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

.

Online and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

; praise for care and real skills outweighs a vocal minority of poor experiences.

Online reviews are more uniformly positive; in-person has both glowing and 1-star outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Clear criteria and help many, but and an F after full effort keep it from lenient.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Practical briefs, calendaring, and .

Format shift

Similar effort expectations online and in person.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Strong praise for , and real office skills, offset by early-career or clarity complaints.

Format shift

Online students especially stress accessibility and video examples.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grade centers on paralegal-style assignments (TOC, authorities, calendaring) more than pure exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize practical work; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is often called tough but fair with , though a few report rude responses and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Amazing professor. Tough but fair.”
LEGAL146
“She gives a lot of ”
LEGAL146
“ ”
PLGL146

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are mostly praised as online-savvy with real-life examples, encouragement, and high grades.

Main concern

One sharp critique questions her depth and program hiring path.

What students said

“One of the . She knows the material and is able to help at any time”
PLGL146
“Her videos had a lot of real life examples of working as a paralegal”
PLGL146
“ !”
LEGAL146

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment mixes practical paralegal assignments with occasional tests; reviews do .

Practical assignmentsSome testsExtra creditNo textbook often

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practical assignments; one student found test questions ambiguous. Reviews do not clearly prove closed-book proctoring details.

Practical assignmentsSome ambiguous testsExtra credit
“some of the questions are ambiguous on the tests”
PLGL146
“ as a paralegal such as table of contents/authorities and calendaring”
LEGAL146

Online

Online reviews emphasize videos and practical learning; they .

Video lecturesPractical examplesAssignment-focused
“Her videos had a lot of real life examples of working as a paralegal”
PLGL146
“Professor T was always encouraging and went at a slow pace which I appreciated”
PLGL146

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Amazing professor. Tough but fair.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews (6 online, 8 in person), balancing strong practical-teaching praise with clarity and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“One of the . She knows the material and is able to help at any time”

🛠️ Practical Training

80/100

“ as a paralegal such as table of contents/authorities and calendaring”

⚠️ Clarity Risk

35/100

“ ”

👍 Recommendation

76/100

“If you're looking for good teaching then it's her!”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • Amazing professor. Tough but fair.
  • !
  • very likable instructor!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to put effort but you should do well
  • She gives a lot of
  • I never missed class, turned in every assignment, and still got an F

Theme 3

💻 About Online Teaching

  • Online Savvy
  • Her videos had a lot of real life examples of working as a paralegal
  • she went at a slow pace which I appreciated

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

14 detailed reviews from 2013-2024 across online and but a few strong outliers reduce perfect confidence.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

LEGAL1467 reviews
PLGL1467 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values