AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Sanja Morris

PHILO101 · PHIL025 · HUMAN3 · PHIL001 · PHILO25 · PHIL003 · PHILO30 · PHILO025 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a serious philosophy course and will fully engage, not for an easy GE A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough but caringPolarizing lecturesEssay picky graderParticipation heavyPhilosophy serious
  • Effort maps closely to grade; she rewards real engagement and punishes shortcuts.
  • Online recent reviews warn , and harsh GE expectations.
  • In person fans praise kindness and thinking-focused lectures while critics cite boring style, accent, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A is possible with real study and participation, but tough or .

Online ; in person still ties grade tightly to work quality.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Philosophy content and , though some sections feel manageable if you stay current.

Online and in , and concept difficulty with occasional easy-pass reports.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Participation and out.

In person participation is stressed; online includes checks on whether materials were opened.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; love for caring insight balances avoid warnings about toughness and dull lectures.

In person has both gem and ; recent online lean more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Repeated tough grader and .

Format shift

Online and in person both report stickler grading; a few still find exams fair if prepared.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Readings, discussions, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online notes lengthy assignments; in and group work.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some call lectures amazing and caring; others find them dull, vague, or .

Format shift

Polarization is strong in person over years; online quality is also split.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of discussions, writing assignments, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online summer formats detail MCQ plus FRQ exams; in person emphasizes essays and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

caring and insightful for engaged students, dull or for others, with .

Main concern

Lecture pace, accent clarity, and .

What students said

“Homework and if you pay attention in class.”
phil001
“She is a very picky professor. When you write essay, she will mark out even a small word error and .”
PHIL003

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online philosophy is lecture- and , and exams; recent reviews are harsher on attitude and grading.

Main concern

, and limited makeups make online GE riskier.

What students said

“If you don't look at the materials and go straight into doing the assignment she will give you 0.”
PHILO101
“pretty easy to get an A but you do need to put in a bit of effort.”
PHIL003

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and essays matter; and unfriendly.

Essay heavyMidterm and finalMCQ plus short answer onlineTimed tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews cite essay-heavy exams and .

Essay examsHomework collectionParticipation
“almost all of .”
PHIL003

Online

Online often uses discussions, writing assignments, and and free response.

Weekly discussionsWritten assignmentsMCQ and FRQ exams
“ with 1-5 frq.”
PHIL003
“the time nor an accurate preparation to answer all the 40 questions”
PHILO101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The output (grade) is a direct reflection of .)”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 philosophy and social science reviews with polarized tone across formats. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️ Effort Equals Grade

38/100

“She doesn't care for excuses she cares about results.”

❤️ Caring Reputation

70/100

“Professor Morris is a true gem. She really cares about all her students and doesnt want to see anyone fail.”

⚠️ Online Strictness

28/100

“Don't even waste your time signing up the online class.”

🎯 Lecture Split

52/100

“her lectures really make you think and wonder about life.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was such an amazing professor her lectures really make you think.
  • One of the most boring classes I have ever taken.
  • She confuses herself often and causes us to get lost.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is also a sense.
  • Homework and if you pay attention in class.
  • pretty easy to get an A but you do need to put in a bit of effort.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and caring about her students although a .
  • and will even meet with you before class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven reviews over many years show a stable split between caring-teacher fans and .

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 59
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHILO308 reviews
PHIL0034 reviews
PHIL0254 reviews
PHILO1013 reviews
PHILO253 reviews
Show 4 more courses
phil0012 reviews
35071 review
HUMAN31 review
PHILO0251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 5 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1