Lynora Rogacs

PHILOSOPHY25 · HUMANITIES4 · PHIL025 · PHILO25HONORS · PHIL25 · HUMAN1 · PHILO25 · PHIILO025 · PHILO3 · HUMANITIES1 · RELIGIOUSSTD1 · PHILO0062 · PHI25 · PHIL007 · 180 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 78/100
RMP rating: 4.1/5
Take again: 77.78%
Difficulty: 2.9

The decision

if you want a structured critical thinking class and will stay on deadlines; skip if you need a low-effort GE.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit saviorOrganized online modulesWork for your AStrong feedbackCritical thinking focused

, and to protect your grade.
Course often starts harder then becomes clearer; effort strongly predicts outcome.
Students praise responsiveness and clarity more than free A ease.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

A is common with and steady work, but several reviews say you must truly understand material for exams.

; in person more often says work hard for the A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Critical thinking content is rewarding but reading-heavy and concept application is not trivial.

Online accelerated terms feel denser; in person and readings.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Online often optional attendance with required live chats or ; in .

Online flexibility is higher than traditional in person expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, and learning payoff despite real workload.

Recommendation is strong in both formats with a minority of hard or arrogant complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Feedback is detailed and often fair; not a free soft A, but and .

Format shift

Online and in person both mix tough grader tags with .

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Essays, group projects, modules, and .

Format shift

Online due-date density is a ; in person adds lecture prep and Softchalk.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students repeatedly praise clear lectures, quick responses, and .

Format shift

Online highlights Canvas organization; in person highlights lecture clarity and office help.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and several exams.

Format shift

Online often lists 4 essays and 4 exams; in person similar plus wiki or project finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person lectures are often called clear and , and strict no-BS expectations.

Main concern

and some students find rules or lecture style polarizing.

What students said

“Philosophy is not hard, applying the concepts is hard and she makes it simple and understandable. ”
PHILO25

“For me personally, I really had to work for that A. Be prepare to work hard.”
PHIL25

Remote format

Online

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online PHIL025 is organized with , and frequent ; easy only if you keep pace.

Main concern

and many due dates with limited late flexibility.

What students said

“Took her online class and it is an easy A, just be sure to understand your material. .”
PHIL025

“Lots of reading and the information is not cohesive. .”
PHIL25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams matter and can be tough, though and cushions grades.

Open book online mentionedMultiple choice and written examsExtra creditGroup projects

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person exams include multiple choice and written work; study of lectures and Softchalk is repeatedly advised.

Multiple examsWritten examsSoftchalk lessonsStudy guide support

“4 exams(2 50 multiple choice ?'s, 2 written) 4 hw assignments, paper, .”
PHILO25

“ and the as well.”
PHIL025

Online

Online students report open-book tests in , and if already at A.

Open book testsWritten and MC examsExtra creditNo late exceptions noted by some

“ and but definitely doable and not hard.”
PHIL025

“If you're happy to pass with a C, you don't have to do all the work, and ”
PHIL025

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Because of Prof. Rogacs I changed my major to philosophy. .”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 philosophy and related course reviews with rich online and in person detail. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Gives everything needed to succeed in the class. Moderate amount of work and she is always there to give additional assistance/help.”

📈 Effort For Grade

62/100

“You'll have to put in the effort to earn the grade you want. Definitely do the .”

📝 Workload Reality

40/100

“Just be prepared to work.”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“Overall, great professor. Learned a lot from her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Doesn't hesitate to clarify and .
and gives good lectures.
An inspirational instructor, that makes you think out of the box.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

This class is not an easy A. You have to understand the material clearly to pass the exams.
Fairly easy A if you study.
DO THE !

Theme 3

📚 About Course Structure

Workload is heavier at the start and lightens each week.
Grace period for late work and available.
PDF of textbook is provided.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

180

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years with detailed assessment structure and consistent effort-for-grade themes support high confidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5113

4 out of 525

3 out of 518

2 out of 514

1 out of 510

Course coverage

PHIL02519 reviews

PHIL259 reviews

PHILO259 reviews

PHI252 reviews

0021 review

Show 10 more courses

HUMAN11 review

HUMANITIES11 review

HUMANITIES41 review

PHIILO0251 review

PHIL0071 review

PHILO00621 review

PHILO25HONORS1 review

PHILO31 review

PHILOSOPHY251 review

RELIGIOUSSTD11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 4 · A 15 · A- 1

B range

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1

Lynora Rogacs

x x if you want a structured critical thinking class and will stay on deadlines; skip if you need a low-effort GE.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Varies

WorthIt

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

📈 Effort For Grade

📝 Workload Reality

👍 Recommendation

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

📚 About Course Structure

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you want a structured critical thinking class and will stay on deadlines; skip if you need a low-effort GE.